taking the 2 : Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:41 pm  

again we failed to take 2 when gifted, a captain should be feeling how the game is going and taking easy points on offer, we were'nt in our attacking mould tonight as the forwards were very poor, but credit to the dobbins as their defence line was far quicker than ours, it was easy to see the game was going to be tight, so we end up losing because of poor game management, as for whiting, his kicking has to be seriously questioned, very poor first attempt in the last two games,, we seem to be falling into the, its to early to be taking the two, still time on the clock, well if the coach can't see it, the captain cant see it, we have a problem, when us the fans can see the game is going to be tight. and whiting is defo suffering from his testimonial events, not the player we know,

Re: taking the 2 : Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:44 pm  

In the same post you've complained about not kicking for 2, but then also brought up Whiting's poor kicking.
Maybe the team aren't confident they will even get the 2.

Re: taking the 2 : Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:46 pm  

Hasbag wrote:

In the same post you've complained about not kicking for 2, but then also brought up Whiting's poor kicking.
Maybe the team aren't confident they will even get the 2.

THE PENALTY WAS UNDER THE POST, THATS THE POINT

Re: taking the 2 : Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:48 pm  

I said we should have took the 2

Re: taking the 2 : Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:49 pm  

I'm not normally one for taking the 2. But I think in a tight game like that where we aren't offering much of an attacking threat they can make a big difference.

Re: taking the 2 : Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:00 pm  

Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:

I'm not normally one for taking the 2. But I think in a tight game like that where we aren't offering much of an attacking threat they can make a big difference.

spot on, we have no pace apart from shaul and rankin, and our attack was poor, so taking the 2 should have been easy for the coach or captain to make,
away from the the thread but radfords team selection is starting to look questionable, sometimes u have to pick quality and experience over who's playing a little better than the senior player, in that position, crooks kept us in the game with his kicking against salford, but is then dropped, well after tonight i would drop whiting, no were the player we no, and his kicking is shocking

Re: taking the 2 : Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:41 am  

I think its a common place failing among a lot of teams and coaches and if you had taken the two on several occ at Wembley it may have been a diff outcome. I am a big snooker fan and an enthusiastic club snooker player, and if an easy yellow is on offer to continue my break I wont try a difficult black

Re: taking the 2 : Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:55 am  

It would be interesting to see how many times we have scored a try following turning down the 2 at possible crucial times just lately. After the shoulder charge penalty the set of 6 we had was terrible and a total waste. At times our goal line attack looks clueless.

For me some of the "lesser teams" we would expect to win against they actually fancy beating us. Subsequently they turn up with more enthusiasm and their confidence grows as the game goes on. We struggle to be willing to go back to basics in these games, unwilling to put the hard work in to build field position and be patient.

I don't think we're a million miles off though and a slight tweak and the odd improved player added and we will get there.

Re: taking the 2 : Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:34 pm  

piddy13 wrote:

....i would drop whiting, no were the player we no, and his kicking is shocking

Unfair on Whiting. He's not a kicker, he knows it and we know it, but as part of his Jack of All Trades profile he's the next best thing we have.

I'll bet my house he's far from comfortable about taking on the kicking duties and would be delighted to off-load the responsibility onto someone else. Being the character he is, though, and willing to do anything he can to contribute to the team, much in the same way as he will play out of position anywhere he's asked if the coach needs him to do so, he's put up his hand to attempt the kicks 'cos no-one else can. He should be praised for this unwelcome commitment, not lambasted when he proves he's no Tickle.

Westy was generally accepted as the best kicker at the club but, unlike Whiting, asked to be relieved of the duties. Now, I don't know if this was a confidence issue, him being aware that every nuance of his performances were scrutinized by the fans early on in the season after mutterings about his commitment at the end of last season and through the off. Or perhaps he wanted to concetrate on his loose forward role with no distractions.

Both understandable reasons. But, as one of our best players this season, his LF role cemented and his performances lauded unanimously, his confidence must be high at present. Is it time to ask him to step up to take the goals again?

Either way, neither Whiting nor Westerman are the long-term solution for this crucial role. Games shouldn't be won or lost by the number of goals kicked, but the reality is that they are. Two crucial games nicked by last minute drop goals, a sigh every time we score more than 10 yards from the sticks, we can't carry on like this. Bugger the half back conundrum, we a need a kicker more than anything else, imo

Re: taking the 2 : Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:41 pm  

WormInHand wrote:

Unfair on Whiting. He's not a kicker, he knows it and we know it, but as part of his Jack of All Trades profile he's the next best thing we have.

I'll bet my house he's far from comfortable about taking on the kicking duties and would be delighted to off-load the responsibility onto someone else. Being the character he is, though, and willing to do anything he can to contribute to the team, much in the same way as he will play out of position anywhere he's asked if the coach needs him to do so, he's put up his hand to attempt the kicks 'cos no-one else can. He should be praised for this unwelcome commitment, not lambasted when he proves he's no Tickle.

Westy was generally accepted as the best kicker at the club but, unlike Whiting, asked to be relieved of the duties. Now, I don't know if this was a confidence issue, him being aware that every nuance of his performances were scrutinized by the fans early on in the season after mutterings about his commitment at the end of last season and through the off. Or perhaps he wanted to concetrate on his loose forward role with no distractions.

Both understandable reasons. But, as one of our best players this season, his LF role cemented and his performances lauded unanimously, his confidence must be high at present. Is it time to ask him to step up to take the goals again?

Either way, neither Whiting nor Westerman are the long-term solution for this crucial role. Games shouldn't be won or lost by the number of goals kicked, but the reality is that they are. Two crucial games nicked by last minute drop goals, a sigh every time we score more than 10 yards from the sticks, we can't carry on like this. Bugger the half back conundrum, we a need a kicker more than anything else, imo