number 6 wrote:
childs was shambolic, sinbinning radford on his first tackle, yet failed to act on 4 or 5 warnigs to orr about his teams tackling, the guy is terrible, cas are not or weren't that great tonight, childs marched them up the field numerous times, we out muscled them in the middle yet were given nothing unlike cas who won penalties from fc players laying on, even the west yorks match commentator had a sly smile when asked if radford should've been binnedn according to radio humberside
classy cas? no , lucky cas yes, soon it will run out
best team on the night lost
1. Sin bin was for a chicken wing tackle, new rules brought in LAST WEEK made it an automatic sin bin
2. Hull scored all their tries off the back of penalties that aren't penalties with other refs
3. You can't say any team were the better side with how bad the ref was
4. Woo, "lucky" for one of the
6 wins, what a bad team
shauney wrote:
Why was Radford given 10?
Chicken wing, new RFL rules make it an automatic sin bin, as is attacking a prone attackers knees in the tackle now.
