Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:35 pm  

Wilde 3 wrote:

Same squad has been named though - weird they are keeping Horne named.

to keep nathan brown guessing??

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:37 pm  

Wilde 3 wrote:

Same squad has been named though - weird they are keeping Horne named.

Maybe they'd always planned to name the same squad? Maybe his injury isn't too bad and he'll play from the bench as I reckon Gentle will only want to play Wade for 60 minutes again.

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:59 pm  

number 6 wrote:

bring 'em on!

not expecting a win, but with the gentle touch and gameplan, you can't write us off!

I am not sure what to expect, we all just keep getting surprise after surprise, which is so refreshing.You cannot keep the smile off my face at the moment and may it long continue.

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:25 pm  

Wouldn't risk Horne, especially as we have Ellis. No need in playing him if he's 100% and potentially worsening his strain/injury.
Apart from that I'd go with the same line-up, with either Nicklas or Kent on the bench.

McKinnon
Sharp
Turner
Yeaman
Briscoe
Ellis
Seymour
Lynch
Houghton
Radford
Manu
Tickle
Whiting

Aspinwall
Bowden
Pitts
Kent/Nicklas

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 4:43 pm  

McKinnon at FB, with either Kent or Nicko on the bench. Kent would give us some better rotation in the forwards and Nicko could give Houghton a valuable rest.

In Gentle We Trust.

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 6:18 pm  

Marfa Manu wrote:

True...I will say Horney won't play and I know nowt either

Even I know Hornie wont play and I live in the sticks - PG told when we were on the bus

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 6:22 pm  

I'm a fan of Richard Horne - his effort in the derby was outstanding, but I'm desperate to see a full Seymour and Ellis partnership, just to see how it goes. If Horne is not 100%, and I very much doubt he is and with McKinnon back this should be the game in my opinion.

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:11 pm  

Bal wrote:

I'm a fan of Richard Horne - his effort in the derby was outstanding, but I'm desperate to see a full Seymour and Ellis partnership, just to see how it goes. If Horne is not 100%, and I very much doubt he is and with McKinnon back this should be the game in my opinion.

Agree.

I know they'll be a few knocks within the team, but let's not play anyone with an injury. Let's play the fittest team. Horne will be back soon enough and hopefully so will some of the pack. It's a long season. let's manage the squaad right. Ellis will be fine and welcome the opportunity to shine.

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:28 pm  

Bal wrote:

I'm a fan of Richard Horne - his effort in the derby was outstanding, but I'm desperate to see a full Seymour and Ellis partnership, just to see how it goes. If Horne is not 100%, and I very much doubt he is and with McKinnon back this should be the game in my opinion.

you miss the bradford game then when horne was fb and ellis partnered seymour in the halves?

Re: So then, Hudds. : Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:30 pm  

will radders play again? seemed to say thats it when interviewed after, and he would need all week to recover from the derby. kent didnt play in the u20s derby, maybe he will play instead of radders