Re: Warrington Away : Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:49 am
Chris71 wrote:
I'm not arguing about the system stopping clubs being forced to play when the numbers are seriously reduced but given the amount of postponements I'd question if the system itself needs adapting like others have said if a player has no symptons and gives a negative test then rather than have to isolate could they be cleared to continue?
Any player that tests positive then that's a no brainer of course.
And yes there maybe 6 times as many cases compared to the start of the season but so far in no other sport other than SL seems to have so many issues so its a fair point to question the policies and procedures as to whether they need adapting.
Any player that tests positive then that's a no brainer of course.
And yes there maybe 6 times as many cases compared to the start of the season but so far in no other sport other than SL seems to have so many issues so its a fair point to question the policies and procedures as to whether they need adapting.
Other sports have been affected eg England one day squad was completely changed at short notice, football friendlies are being cancelled.
Cricket seems to be coping, but not may other sports to compare with, although the NRL is in a bit of a pickle at the moment.
Anyway, this might help, but not a lot. The RFL's hands are tied.
From 16 August in England, fully vaccinated adults and all under-18s contacted by NHS Test and Trace (not the app) will be advised to take one PCR test as soon as possible.
As long as that is negative, and they don't develop symptoms, they won't need to take further action.
As long as that is negative, and they don't develop symptoms, they won't need to take further action.
It sounds like the "return to play" protocol is currently under review.