Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:10 pm  

how much do you think mr allam paid for a £1 million tax bill. ?

[Durham Giant]

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:17 pm  

TOO DRUNK TO FIND MY OTHERVPOST BUT


I dont know al the politics in the Hull press area but after listening to Gwyillum on five live what a ******* ******

Talk about c;ueless and not being PR savvy

Saying it is a terrible for RL and although they willl put a spin on it etc. that RL and the UKADA will spin it is realy embarassing.

Not as if the media need a reason to kick RL then this dick joins in.

If he reads this or anyone who knows him reads this tell him to shut up knocking RL. A half decent journalist would have dealt with it without knocking RL.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:22 pm  

OmneFC wrote:

Surely AP has grounds to sue the previous regime, as they hid the facts of the investigation under what seems to be a pretence to sell the club for a higher amount.....

Unless they deliberately lied to AP or deliberately hid any potential problem, then it's his duty to conduct due dilligence

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:24 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

A half decent journalist would have dealt with it without knocking RL.

Nail, head, thwack

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:25 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

A half decent journalist would have dealt with it without knocking RL.

This is Gwilym Lloyd, though. He's an ice hockey and cricket specialist who supports Hull KR and knows little about RL outside of the city of Hull, despite being the Radio Humberside "Rugby League Editor". He'll be absolutely loving it, for drama and the negative impact on FC. Bet he was gutted there was no Sportstalk tonight - he could have banged on about it for hours.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:25 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

TOO DRUNK TO FIND MY OTHERVPOST BUT


I dont know al the politics in the Hull press area but after listening to Gwyillum on five live what a ******* ******

Talk about c;ueless and not being PR savvy

Saying it is a terrible for RL and although they willl put a spin on it etc. that RL and the UKADA will spin it is realy embarassing.

Not as if the media need a reason to kick RL then this dick joins in.

If he reads this or anyone who knows him reads this tell him to shut up knocking RL. A half decent journalist would have dealt with it without knocking RL.

Gollom is a rovers fan and does very little to hide this fact when carrying out his duties as an impartial sports journalsit on local bbc radio.

He love nothing more than getting his teeth into Hull FC and would more than likely been having a 5 knuckle shuffle whilst disgussing our latest fiasco on National radio.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:29 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Great to see so many Rovers fans on here today, mainly lurkers, especially our friendly moderator R.B.A., who can't get enough of it and has superglued his finger to the "refresh" button, apparently. Flies and $hite spring to mind. I see RoversTrace was on earlier too, even though she's apparently not remotely interested in F.C. Such gloryhunters. At least I make a t!t of myself on a daily basis on their board. In it for the long haul, me.

Jesus woman, you've got no room to comment on the fact that there are fans from the the east side of the city lurking on your board.
You seem to spend more time on the rovers board than some of the rovers fans themselves, especialy when there is an incident or rumour concerning HKR.
Another thing i notice is, you always seem to insert a laughing smiley at the end of your comments, perhaps you are someone who is full of your own self importance and actualy think your comments are always funny, just an observation of course.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:31 pm  

Glad the relevant parties have gone, what an idiot Rule was. I seriously wonder who else knew, obviously some on this board had an inkling, going on previous posts, but it worries me about how wide spread the cover up is. Who else is being covered for in the game? We all hear rumours about who is sniffing what, etc but to actually "know" what is going on and covering up is beyond belief. It is a bad day for rugby league, BUT these people are not with us any longer and hopefully this is the end of the whole Etherington/Rule/Agar era.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:32 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Good statement IMO. References Kath twice, and a nice closing paragraph. That's taken a bit of crafting.

Indeed. A fine piece of necessary distancing and underlining of the relevant players.

If the RFL are to investigate this further, I wonder if the case would be against Hull FC as it is the same registered company albeit with a new board and owners, or against the individuals concerned at the time.

Trust Lord Faulkner to do what's necessary, only hope he's not jaded by the extent of the squirming worms he's uncanned.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:34 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

The thing I can't get my head around is, even if you have the inclination to cheat and the feckwittery to lie about it, "Why bother?" FC under Agar were awful and were never going to win anything, with or without a knackered and troublesome centre. Why would two people risk their career over it?

Spot on as usual Mrs B