Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Wed Sep 07, 2011 5:54 pm  

Ooh, Pete's on now.

[Chris71]

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:33 pm  

Bl00dy hell, thats the most sense I've heard from any of the presenters on Sports Talk this week about Agar etc and its come from Phil Buckingham the City reporter of the HDM!!! His opening gambit was great about Doc not gonna like what he says and he just can't see how Doc can say the club have moved forward under Agar.

Have to say considering he says he doesnt have much interest in RL it was very interesting hearing an opinion from someone on the outside looking in. Pretty much nailed it for me and his last comment about a club the size of Hull with the revenue and fan base should not be outside the top 4 is why the club had to have a change.

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:42 pm  

Chris71 wrote:

:shock:

Bl00dy hell, thats the most sense I've heard from any of the presenters on Sports Talk this week about Agar etc and its come from Phil Buckingham the City reporter of the HDM!!! His opening gambit was great about Doc not gonna like what he says and he just can't see how Doc can say the club have moved forward under Agar.

Have to say considering he says he doesnt have much interest in RL it was very interesting hearing an opinion from someone on the outside looking in. Pretty much nailed it for me and his last comment about a club the size of Hull with the revenue and fan base should not be outside the top 4 is why the club had to have a change.

Agreed he was spot on.

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:43 pm  

thehullwhitestar wrote:

Couldn't have put it better myself

I wouldn't have a clue when I joined this forum but I do know that it was many many years after first going to the boulevard.

If you look just under your avatar you'll see it was just after the cup win, bandwaggoner.

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 7:14 pm  

Neil HFC wrote:

If you look just under your avatar you'll see it was just after the cup win, bandwaggoner.

God I've just noticed that !

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:49 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

I'm waiting for RH to call me back.

I bet you wish they hadn't after he owned you.

Doc: Tell me a player who Agar hasn't improved

You: Ermmmm ermm ah ah errmmm

Doc: Because you can't, BOOM

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:56 pm  

MrPhilb wrote:

I bet you wish they hadn't after he owned you.

Doc: Tell me a player who Agar hasn't improved

You: Ermmmm ermm ah ah errmmm

Doc: Because you can't, BOOM

I coudn't give a shoite who owned who.

Mrs B sounds hot.

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:00 pm  

MrPhilb wrote:

I bet you wish they hadn't after he owned you.

Doc: Tell me a player who Agar hasn't improved

You: Ermmmm ermm ah ah errmmm

Doc: Because you can't, BOOM

Was the correct answer Dominic Maloney?

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:01 pm  

MrPhilb wrote:

I bet you wish they hadn't after he owned you.

Doc: Tell me a player who Agar hasn't improved

You: Ermmmm ermm ah ah errmmm

Doc: Because you can't, BOOM

You name one then. You've got 5 seconds.

Re: craig murdoch/sportstalk : Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:07 pm  

MrPhilb wrote:

I bet you wish they hadn't after he owned you.

Doc: Tell me a player who Agar hasn't improved

You: Ermmmm ermm ah ah errmmm

Doc: Because you can't, BOOM

I know! Sad day when I get owned by that thicko. He had some great counter-arguments to my stats, mind.