Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:49 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

He cost us the game because whenever we had field position and looked to apply pressure he pinged us with imaginary penalties. He did the same to you, just not at as vital times.

He also gave a penalty to cas for (presumably) interferance that never was, that Cas subsequently scored from.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:50 pm  

airliebird58 wrote:

I dont think I can add to what everyone has said on this thread about the referee. He was an absolute disgrace, one of the worst performances I have seen in 30+ years of being a Hull FC fan.
What I will add is this. If it is true that some of our 'fans' where calling for Agars head after that game (in the vicinity of the press conference so I believe) They want to give it a rest. I saw a team tonight playing for their coach, no matter what any of us think of him, this is a FACT.
So lets stop the moaning and start doing what us Hull FC fans are good at, supporting the bloody team!

Apparently banging on the windows of the press room and chanting!

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:51 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

If the ref calls held and simultaneously the ball is off-loaded then it is indeed a scrum, with head and feed given to the team in possession.
He did enough wrong without this one though.

Why would he call held when the player had only just gone into contact was still on his feet moving forward with his arms free for an offload? If he did call held at that point it's even worse!

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:52 pm  

Robbo4 wrote:

Why would he call held when the player had only just gone into contact was still on his feet moving forward with his arms free for an offload? If he did call held at that point it's even worse!

TBF, that's happened a bit this season, and when the player has offloaded the ball they have got penalised.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:55 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

Look daft lad, stick to Safety Camera Partnerships and stop pretending you know the Laws of the Game or even simple common sense. The scenario you described has one of THREE outcomes:

1) Ref decides "ball steal" - penalty to side in possession

2) Ref decides "pass after tackle" - penalty to tackling side

3) Ball "comes loose" (as in either passed or stripped) as he called "held" - scrum with head & feed to team last in possession

The only time I would criticise the ref, given the above, is if he awarded a scrum with head & ball to the tackling side.

Anything to add?

look soft c0ck stick to fishing and telling everyone else how much you know about literally everything, because I'm not interested. You didn't see it so just pipe down.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:56 pm  

Robbo4 wrote:

Why would he call held when the player had only just gone into contact was still on his feet moving forward with his arms free for an offload? If he did call held at that point it's even worse!

Because his leg was lifted.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:57 pm  

tommyfromhull wrote:

TBF, that's happened a bit this season, and when the player has offloaded the ball they have got penalised.

So not a scrum then?

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:58 pm  

After a couple of excellent pints in the Welly I'm still completely p*ssed off that I've watched a game completely dominated by the referee's performance.

Having binned Radford for the first offence he then penalises Cas for offside 5 times in 5 minutes but can't find his card. He warns the Cas captain at least twice but still only finds his card to bin one from each side for a minor brawl.

All credit to Richard Agar for saying what most of us fans were thinking.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:59 pm  

Child was bad for both teams, but ATEOTD he gave us 3 cards and them 1, gave them penalties in more danger areas (2 of with they kicked, BTW, which would have made the game 16-18 in our favour) and sent our player to the sin bin with no warning and repeatedly did nothing to their players after numerous warnings.

Truly awful ref.

Re: Childs : Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:00 am  

Robbo4 wrote:

So not a scrum then?

Was just commenting on the player been called held too early, nothing else. Haven't properly read the full content of your debate.