Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:43 am  

staying on at City, making all the right noises for me.

HAPPY DAYS

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:43 am  

Standee wrote:

Challenge Cup and Playoffs the "norm" and not the exception. AMBITION, we never heard that from Kath!!!

In all fairness we've never heard out from Kath.

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:44 am  

Martha Manu wrote:

Keeping Rule, good move imo

Not for 'The Brother'.

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:44 am  

Standee wrote:

staying on at City, making all the right noises for me.

HAPPY DAYS

Same...

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:44 am  

so, we've had a split board for all these years, but then we knew that!

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:45 am  

fartown since 1961 wrote:

maybe K . hetherington will move to the board at Leeds... £3m would go a long way to solving their new stand problem... could be way off beam but .....................

2-3m between 5 now ex-board members, kath wasn't the majority shareholder

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:45 am  

Loves the rivalry..no merger, Phew

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:45 am  

unity at boardroom level, hmmmm, combined Hull team v tourists at the KC

NO MERGER

he said it

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:46 am  

Standee wrote:

staying on at City, making all the right noises for me.

HAPPY DAYS

Sounds good .

Re: Adam Pearson in Hull FC takeover bid.... : Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:46 am  

Should of gotten rid of rule IMHO,

Rule stays, Agar and current coaching staff will remain. I feel as if theres more to this. Is pearson the full owner, and if so, so he can continue his input at hull city, has he left rule in charge? to make all the decisions. And pearson is just the guy that sorts the finances out?

if the above is correct, it's no better IMHO.