Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:54 am  

I smell troll and a bad one at that

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:55 am  

WormInHand wrote:

What I am saying is that not everything was a lie and done deceitfully or with bad motives, and a lot of what was acheived off the pitch was good. More than good.

More than good acheivements? I'm sure Arsenal are very happy with 60000 passholders and money in the bank and shirt sales beyond belief.
Means nowt if the win nowt

I wonder if they cough all that up to win summat (or be above Spurs at the moment)

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:03 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

I smell troll and a bad one at that

Amazing how quickly a whiff becomes a stench.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:10 am  

WormInHand wrote:

You're trying to paint a picture of a man incompetent in all areas and with purely evil intentions. Like saying a teacher is unable to teach because she gives out the wrong text books one day or the delivery man is an incompetent driver because he hands over the wrong parcel, this total dismissal of everything Rule did as being no good makes you look a fool.

1) The Reardon debacle
2) The Challenge Cup registration debacle
3) Taking spin to excessive and unnecessary levels.
4) Lying to the fans about the club owing no money to anyone
5) Missing a match to go on a boozy weekend in Dublin when the club is in crisis
6) The Crocker debacle

And that's just off the top of my head.

But yes, if you put his two year ban for being complicit in covering up a doping scandal to one side, you've certainly got me looking a fool there...

[Kosh]

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:10 am  

Ovid wrote: Gleeson is considering legal action against the club, according to The Daily Star: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/2 ... -drug-ban/ Good luck with that, Martin.

Ovid wrote: Gleeson is considering legal action against the club, according to The Daily Star: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/2 ... -drug-ban/ Good luck with that, Martin.

[Kosh]

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:15 am  

R.B.A wrote:

"Other players are also said to have taken the supplement but only Gleeson was dope tested."


Could be interesting times ahead if Gleeson decides to take this further.

Oh please.

Your trolling gets worse. If there is any chance of other players being in bother then UKDA will already be after them. What Gleeson does from here on in is immaterial - he's already spilled his guts as part of the agreement that reduced his ban.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:17 am  

Garry Brindley Esq. wrote:

1) The Reardon debacle
2) The Challenge Cup registration debacle
3) Taking spin to excessive and unnecessary levels.
4) Lying to the fans about the club owing no money to anyone
5) Missing a match to go on a boozy weekend in Dublin when the club is in crisis
6) The Crocker debacle

And that's just off the top of my head.

But yes, if you put his two year ban for being complicit in covering up a doping scandal to one side, you've certainly got me looking a fool there...

Can we have a blunder list on the 1st page just to remind us what the last administration gave us.

I'll add 2 x salary cap, Paul Cooke, and the lack of a training facility.

[Kosh]

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:20 am  

east hull FC fan wrote:

Amazing how quickly a whiff becomes a stench.

It's because they're mostly thick and therefore can't handle subtlety. The sad thing is that they think they're really clever. Pitiful really.

[Kosh]

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:26 am  

Garry Brindley Esq. wrote:

1) The Reardon debacle
Only a 'debacle' on here. Minor news everywhere else. And I doubt the decision to sign him was Rule's.
2) The Challenge Cup registration debacle
Fair enough - and he admitted to the erroe.
3) Taking spin to excessive and unnecessary levels.
A purely subjective statement, generally made by people who don't understand marketing.
4) Lying to the fans about the club owing no money to anyone
Economical with the truth at the very least.
5) Missing a match to go on a boozy weekend in Dublin when the club is in crisis
This really is a nonsense, as was pointed out at the time.
6) The Crocker debacle
Crocker was denied a visa due to a change in the rules and a new administrator in Australia. How exactly was this Rule's fault?

See above. If you're going to compile a list you really ought to check it at least twice.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:33 am  

Only the tip of the iceberg I'm afraid