Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:24 pm  

Shocking ref

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:24 pm  

shauney wrote:

I've never seen such a poor refereeing performance. Sat in south stand we were baffled at plenty of his calls.

Why was Radford given 10?

Grapple tackle.

Apparently its only a sin-binning if your wearing Black and White though as Cas were also penalised for it but no sin-binning followed.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:26 pm  

shauney wrote:

I've never seen such a poor refereeing performance. Sat in south stand we were baffled at plenty of his calls.

Why was Radford given 10?

he made a tackle!?

felt worse tonight than when wakey beat us, atleast they worked for it and deserved there win without a big helping hand from the ref

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:27 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

1. Sin bin was for a chicken wing tackle, new rules brought in LAST WEEK made it an automatic sin bin
2. Hull scored all their tries off the back of penalties that aren't penalties with other refs
3. You can't say any team were the better side with how bad the ref was
4. Woo, "lucky" for one of the 6 wins, what a bad team

Chicken wing, new RFL rules make it an automatic sin bin, as is attacking a prone attackers knees in the tackle now.

Agree its difficult to say who the better team was as the game itself was ruined by the moron in the middle. However, I'm pretty sure Childs gave the grapple tackle signal when he binned Radford.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:27 pm  

Wakey have been on the wrong side of Child on more than one occasion.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:28 pm  

From what Rod Studd said, it sounds like Long's sending off was justified.

27 penalties in the game....that means Cas have suffered 64 penalties in the two games reffed by Child. Abysmal.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:28 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

1. Sin bin was for a chicken wing tackle, new rules brought in LAST WEEK made it an automatic sin bin
2. Hull scored all their tries off the back of penalties that aren't penalties with other refs
3. You can't say any team were the better side with how bad the ref was
4. Woo, "lucky" for one of the 6 wins, what a bad team

Chicken wing, new RFL rules make it an automatic sin bin, as is attacking a prone attackers knees in the tackle now.

how many tries did you score of penalties?

we were the better team no matter how you dont want to admit it, your an average team punching above your weight, well done, we are under achieving

every team has lucky wins, you go one tonight

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:29 pm  

Radford went for a choke hold, he asks for consitancy.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:29 pm  

Robbo4 wrote:

Agree its difficult to say who the better team was as the game itself was ruined by the moron in the middle. However, I'm pretty sure Childs gave the grapple tackle signal when he binned Radford.

That's what confused Yorkshire Radio too, they got clarification at HT and they came back with chicken wing and Andy Raleigh explained that last week the teams got sent a DVD showing what tackling techniques will now result in an automatic yellow which is why he got binned so early in t he game.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:29 pm  

wakeytrin wrote:

Wakey have been on the wrong side of Child on more than one occasion.

The man is a joke,and I am not just referring to tonight.