Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:18 pm  

Been in talks for a while. Rovers didn't like it so went for vilification. Backfired as he could have kept them up. Very nice conspiracy theory IMO.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:32 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Been in talks for a while. Rovers didn't like it so went for vilification. Backfired as he could have kept them up. Very nice conspiracy theory IMO.

I believe that he would have made a massive difference against Huddersfield, they maybe could have avoided the MPG, hudge & JP banning him certainly backfired.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:37 pm  

brill signing if we can keep him fit , so much for the people in the know, nobody saw this coming

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:39 pm  

easthull fc fan wrote:

I believe that he would have made a massive difference against Huddersfield, they maybe could have avoided the MPG, hudge & JP banning him certainly backfired.

They would have one one if the last two games with him playing, but we don't know what he had done, think it was the players who asked for him not to play again.

Saw a mention somewhere that he has been training one on one with Hatton.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:42 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

They would have one one if the last two games with him playing, but we don't know what he had done, think it was the players who asked for him not to play again.

Saw a mention somewhere that he has been training one on one with Hatton.

Ricky.... Or metal arm (Paul)

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:42 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

Imagine a back line of

Shaul
Sio
Griffin/Carlos
Fonua
Talanoa
Kelly
Sneyd

To go with out pack.

Could have sworn you signed Connor from Huddersfield, so guess you think he doesn't deserve a look in for your team, Dave.

Regarding Kelly. The 2015 Kelly vintage was excellent, the 2016 iteration was total pants. He is a mood player. Assuming you keep him focused, he will be an excellent signing and a creative step up from Pryce and Tuimavave on the evidence of their contributions last season. He is also very error prone often in a costly way. I have a sneaking suspicion he will go well for you, assuming you ship out Wanky Franky the Tanky back to Oz.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:43 pm  

If this does happen,i wonder when it will be announced?

Be a good signing for us imo

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:44 pm  

didnt some say kelly had been seen (no photo thou) of him training with fc in the gym

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 6:00 pm  

Pickering Red wrote:

Could have sworn you signed Connor from Huddersfield, so guess you think he doesn't deserve a look in for your team, Dave.

Regarding Kelly. The 2015 Kelly vintage was excellent, the 2016 iteration was total pants. He is a mood player. Assuming you keep him focused, he will be an excellent signing and a creative step up from Pryce and Tuimavave on the evidence of their contributions last season. He is also very error prone often in a costly way. I have a sneaking suspicion he will go well for you, assuming you ship out Wanky Franky the Tanky back to Oz.

Not sure where Connor fits in, will get a chance though as can play anyway across the back line, it's up to him to take his chance, all about a squad game, good honest post about the last line.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 6:14 pm  

Pickering Red wrote:

Could have sworn you signed Connor from Huddersfield, so guess you think he doesn't deserve a look in for your team, Dave.
.

This is where you and your club keep going wrong.

Build a squad and you don't need to keep going on about injuries when the injury prone players you sign get erm injured.