Re: RUMOURS : Mon Nov 09, 2015 6:38 pm  

Is that the same whipping boys that came within a whisker of doing the double over the mighty all conquering black and whites last season

Re: RUMOURS : Mon Nov 09, 2015 6:48 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Is that the same whipping boys that came within a whisker of doing the double over the mighty all conquering black and whites last season

No it's ones who won just three from twenty-three in the regular season and then finished two points off 7th in the Super 8s.

Re: RUMOURS : Mon Nov 09, 2015 7:05 pm  

ComeOnYouUll wrote:

No it's ones who won just three from twenty-three in the regular season and then finished two points off 7th in the Super 8s.

So it is the same team then

Re: RUMOURS : Mon Nov 09, 2015 8:48 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Is that the same whipping boys that came within a whisker of doing the double over the mighty all conquering black and whites last season

No, it's the ones who were a couple of minutes from playing championship rugby next season

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:21 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

No, it's the ones who were a couple of minutes from playing championship rugby next season

Wakey were never a couple of minutes away from championship rugby. Banter is only interesting if it is accurate.

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:31 am  

Keiththered wrote:

Wakey were never a couple of minutes away from championship rugby. Banter is only interesting if it is accurate.

Thus speaks the Bantersaurus Rex. Bratfud were only 1 coverted try away from a draw in a tight finish, with Golden point beckoning????????? If my feeble memory serves me well??????

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:32 am  

Keiththered wrote:

Wakey were never a couple of minutes away from championship rugby. Banter is only interesting if it is accurate.

Winning 18-16 with 15 minutes to go and a last minute converted try was pretty close to championship rugby.

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:34 am  

ccs wrote:

Winning 18-16 with 15 minutes to go and a last minute converted try was pretty close to championship rugby.

My feeble memory does not serve me well Thought it was 22-16

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:43 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

No, it's the ones who were a couple of minutes from playing championship rugby next season

You mean the one that was a couple of minutes from beating the big spending under achieving team and doing the double over them despite having nine players missing through injury from the team that hammered you only days earlier, how embarrassing is that for a club whose motto seems to be, we'll just throw more money at it.

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 11:13 am  

chissitt wrote: You mean the one that was a couple of minutes from beating the big spending under achieving team and doing the double over them despite having nine players missing through injury from the team that hammered you only days earlier, how embarrassing is that for a club whose motto seems to be, we'll just throw more money at it. Throw money at it? If only that was the case. Think you need to look a bit closer to home and carry on worrying about survival. viewtopic.php?f=33&t=590194

chissitt wrote: You mean the one that was a couple of minutes from beating the big spending under achieving team and doing the double over them despite having nine players missing through injury from the team that hammered you only days earlier, how embarrassing is that for a club whose motto seems to be, we'll just throw more money at it. Throw money at it? If only that was the case. Think you need to look a bit closer to home and carry on worrying about survival. viewtopic.php?f=33&t=590194