Re: On to Leigh : Sun Mar 26, 2023 8:11 am
bonaire wrote:
Cokey wrote:
Sorry that the question of (in what respect?) has caused so much confusion. It was never a trick question, or anything like that. Thanks for your replies all the same.
You thoroughly deserved the win and out played us at times. Good luck for the rest of the season.
On reflection when I stated we have a stronger squad I was talking bollox.
So you admit that you talk rubbish which is hardly a surprise.Suggest you listen to other peoples views as you seem to know diddly squat about R/L.
The game has changed and you like some of your emoji mates have been left behind and living in the past
Sorry that the question of (in what respect?) has caused so much confusion. It was never a trick question, or anything like that. Thanks for your replies all the same.
You thoroughly deserved the win and out played us at times. Good luck for the rest of the season.
On reflection when I stated we have a stronger squad I was talking bollox.
So you admit that you talk rubbish which is hardly a surprise.Suggest you listen to other peoples views as you seem to know diddly squat about R/L.
The game has changed and you like some of your emoji mates have been left behind and living in the past
On the evidence of yesterdays performance I conceded that my observation about our squad being better than Leigh's was bollox. On yesterdays performance indeed it was and I continued the friendly banter with the Leigh fan. I should have put an emoji in to emphasise that.
Know diddly squat about the game? probably true. You suggest I should listen to other peoples views who have superior knowledge of the game. I'm guessing that means you?
You have made a posts that I agree with. However Jamie Shaul is 30 has never played hooker in his life and will never successfully make that transition now. It's a specialist position that requires a lot more than running from dummy half.