Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:
Is this based on his performance or just that you have looked at him and decided he looks a bit tubby?
I wasn't there last night but based purely on the stats he was comfortably ahead of our other props both for work rate and impact.
Based on the fact he looked knackered after a couple of runs and was stood with his hands on his hips trying to suck some air in for much if his time on the field. His first run was great and he made 25+ metres and hes obviously a handful but he looks like an impact prop for 2 shortish spells rather than someone who should be playing 25 minute spells like he did last night. I think radford took him off 5 minutes into the 2nd half as he was struggling to keep up