Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:58 pm  

The lads with the banner are the disgrace not O'Meley, fair enough expressing an opinion about something or someone but not like that, way out of order, especially from no marks like that.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:00 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

Funny what you say about the players.People say we only improved due to the players which came in, nothing to dow with Agar. Yet when these players make mistakes and fans try to blame them it's Agar who has to take responsibility for them.

Weird!

Not weird at all, that's how it works when you're the Head Coach of an elite sports team.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:01 pm  

Does anyone on this forum actually remember that his appointment was seen as a positive step. After all it was his influence that put us on a run to the grand final. Well that's what everyone said at the time. I worried that we will force him out only to have another coach completely screw up the signings like sharp did after kear

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:02 pm  

garry brindley wrote:

Not weird at all, that's how it works when you're the Head Coach of an elite sports team.

Nah that's just fans being one eyed. When we win it's the players and when we lose it's the coach.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:03 pm  

WestYorksFC wrote:

Does anyone on this forum actually remember that his appointment was seen as a positive step. After all it was his influence that put us on a run to the grand final. Well that's what everyone said at the time. I worried that we will force him out only to have another coach completely screw up the signings like sharp did after kear

They didn't, everyone said it was Swain!

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:04 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

Nah that's just fans being one eyed. When we win it's the players and when we lose it's the coach.

So on that basis you think that the squad we had in 2009 really was the 12th worst in the league?

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:05 pm  

WestYorksFC wrote:

Does anyone on this forum actually remember that his appointment was seen as a positive step. After all it was his influence that put us on a run to the grand final. Well that's what everyone said at the time. I worried that we will force him out only to have another coach completely screw up the signings like sharp did after kear

Reaction was actually pretty mixed. I wasn't in favour of the decision but was prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:07 pm  

garry brindley wrote:

So on that basis you think that the squad we had in 2009 really was the 12th worst in the league?

I can't honestly remember but it's irrelevant. If we win the coach has to take credit then the same when we lose. Anything else is double standards.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:07 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

I don't think he's the man but he has earnt himself time through last season's efforts. It's not rocket science.

If you say you want a new coach, and that you do not think he is the man, then you have judged him now.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:09 pm  

i believe agar is ultimately resposible for performances since he is the one who picks the team and interchanges, so he is the one playing class players out of position such as today playing manu and tickle in the prop area and also not using your whole bench with keeping washy sat on the sidelines for 80 mins. Its not the first time he plays people out of their best position such as berrigan throughout his hull career, and keeping hall on the bench all game. Is there any other super league side that uses 16 out of their available 17 players, or is this a special agar trick?