: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:00 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

Fully agree. If we get him though we won't get a SH for 2010 and that's what I want.

unless he signs a year deal.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:00 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

I agree numbers are irrelevant, what I am saying is Horne and Witt are both runners which imo would leave us unbalanced in the halves.

Witt will organise a side alot more than Thorman imo.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:03 pm  

Superbowl Scott wrote:

Witt will organise a side alot more than Thorman imo.

Not convinced myself, he drifts in and out of games quite a lot. He never organised NZW last season.

Don't get me wrong he is a top player, capable of brilliance at times and he is blessed with some fantastic skills. I would just rather keep our options open for a SH in 2010.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:04 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

unless he signs a year deal.

Makes more sense but then Agar can't sign a utility back that he has been talking about.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:04 pm  

Superbowl Scott wrote:

Witt will organise a side alot more than Thorman imo.

i'd agree.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:07 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

Not convinced myself, he drifts in and out of games quite a lot. He never organised NZW last season.

Don't get me wrong he is a top player, capable of brilliance at times and he is blessed with some fantastic skills. I would just rather keep our options open for a SH in 2010.

I havent seen Thorman organise a side since he left London TBH i just dont see what Thorman brings to the side. The odd good kick thats all, whereas Witt will bring that and a hell of alot more.

Who like for 2010 though ? Please dont say Orford

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:09 pm  

Superbowl Scott wrote:

I havent seen Thorman organise a side since he left London TBH i just dont see what Thorman brings to the side. The odd good kick thats all, whereas Witt will bring that and a hell of alot more.

Who like for 2010 though ? Please dont say Orford

scott prince! but only if hull kr let us.

tbh i'd take orford, why wouldnt you?

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:11 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

scott prince! but only if hull kr let us.

tbh i'd take orford, why wouldnt you?

I would love to have Orford here but theres more chance of Danny 2 playing 7 for Hull next season.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:12 pm  

Superbowl Scott wrote:

Who like for 2010 though ? Please dont say Orford

I agree those who are holding out for Orford are going to be disappointed.
Witt is available now and we have a spot, it doesn't take a lot of working out.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:12 pm  

Superbowl Scott wrote:

I havent seen Thorman organise a side since he left London TBH i just dont see what Thorman brings to the side. The odd good kick thats all, whereas Witt will bring that and a hell of alot more.

Who like for 2010 though ? Please dont say Orford

Witt is a better player than Thorman and Horne imo so I would like him to sign as a player. My only worry would be how well they worked together.

I would prefer a SH who would control and dictate games, I have no preference tbh but I would certainly take Orford, always been a fan of his.