FC Callum wrote:
out of the two i would rather have matt orford
2 years younger and the way he played against leeds in the world club challenege was world class, if he is half as good that for us he would be a good signing
also kimmorleys contract isnt up till 2010
2 years younger and the way he played against leeds in the world club challenege was world class, if he is half as good that for us he would be a good signing
also kimmorleys contract isnt up till 2010
Orford is top of the list for me, and if we are willing to spend the money he will be ours. Whether we're willing is another matter but if we dont i can see season pass sales dropping. Orford would pay for himself in increased revenue for me.