Re: Bye Omeley : Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:13 am  

kingston droolers wrote:

Morning Kosh

Look, i made the post within 10 mins of the game, I was radged, well annoyed that my club is in a heap.
I really don’t want to hear club apologists saying how good Udders are and how its difficult to play there, we were rubbish and will continue to be so.

As for Omeley, he did react, no doubt, at the time I did think he flicked v's (like Craven did and was it Wilson or Aston) anyway, the sign clearly got to him, and for me thats the point. I do apologise for alleging the V’s

You can take it 2 ways:

Should he be professional, not react, ignore it and quietly let it inspire him to be better?

Or does the reaction shows he cares? Before yesterday i loved him, he’s our best forward consistently, I for one have criticised the Club for being so far removed from the fans, is this a hint that the players give a flying monkeys.

If it is the second then fine, but let the players channel this into ripping a new one in Crusaders.

I'm utterly pig sick of loosing, pig sick of £80 days out for nowt, pig sick of dull rugby. Something has to give, now the three things which can "give" as we know is: players, the coaching team, the board.

This club matters to us, the fans, the lifeblood of the club, currently the club is lacking a heartbeat

Nice one

Re: Bye Omeley : Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:18 am  

Well said drooler. TBH I think a lot of people will share the passion you have, and the pigsickness.

Re: Bye Omeley : Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:24 am  

It's irrelevant what mess the club is in, you made unfounded allegations about a member of the playing staff.

All the excuses about how poor we were doesn't wash, O'meleys suppose to act like a professional rl player but as a member of the public you can act how you want?

I doubt there wasn't a person in the staduim more vexed off with the display than O'meley.

Re: Bye Omeley : Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:36 am  

Kosh wrote:

Can't agree with his comments about bad luck, but I've heard the bit about Agar being a good technical coach from some sources who ought to know what they're talking about. Makes it even more puzzling that he can't hack it as head coach really.

To manage people it requires good communication skills , a bit of empathy perhaps and the respect of those being managed. The latter is debatable but Agar doesn't seem to get much respect from those in the media as no one seems interested in his opinion. That in my view is essentially because his communication skills are non existent. I do not understand how someone like him would be able to get his point across to all of the varied personalities , intellects ( or lack of them ) and backgrounds that make up a SL squad. If you can't do that then no matter how good your ideas are it's unlikely that you'll get all of the players on side. Even if he has the technical coaching skills he's out of his depth in the other areas and that will only get worse as the pressure builds on him and his team and as things start to unravel.

Re: Bye Omeley : Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:35 pm  

berrigans bitch wrote:

Right it has been established O'meley did not do the Vs, I apologise for calling him a t0sser (in my defence I was upset yesterday with it all), however had I taken a banner to the match with Agar Out and O'Meley indicated for me to take it down I would have told him to get stuffed tbh.

All last week fans came on here and were ranting about Agar out, yet some-one takes a banner with Agar Out and they have being mocked on this board, I find it unbelievable honestly I do.

If fans take banners it does not mean they do not support the team, (they would just stay away for that), it means they do not support the coach, how else should fans show their feelings, come on here and whinge all week ?

Did you go and stand with them to show your support to them at the end????

Re: Bye Omeley : Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:53 pm  

kingston droolers wrote:

Morning Kosh

Look, i made the post within 10 mins of the game, I was radged, well annoyed that my club is in a heap.
I really don’t want to hear club apologists saying how good Udders are and how its difficult to play there, we were rubbish and will continue to be so.

As for Omeley, he did react, no doubt, at the time I did think he flicked v's (like Craven did and was it Wilson or Aston) anyway, the sign clearly got to him, and for me thats the point. I do apologise for alleging the V’s

You can take it 2 ways:

Should he be professional, not react, ignore it and quietly let it inspire him to be better?

Or does the reaction shows he cares? Before yesterday i loved him, he’s our best forward consistently, I for one have criticised the Club for being so far removed from the fans, is this a hint that the players give a flying monkeys.

If it is the second then fine, but let the players channel this into ripping a new one in Crusaders.

I'm utterly pig sick of loosing, pig sick of £80 days out for nowt, pig sick of dull rugby. Something has to give, now the three things which can "give" as we know is: players, the coaching team, the board.

This club matters to us, the fans, the lifeblood of the club, currently the club is lacking a heartbeat

Well said.

On that point I think we are done now.