Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:32 pm  

Mr Childs reward for his performance last week is to Ref Wigan v dragons on Friday, and touch judge for Wakey on sunday!

Am i being cynical but isn't it funny how he very rarely gets a TV game hmmmmm is Mr Cummins trying to hide someones lack of ability???????????? (just my own little theory lol )

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:34 pm  

garry brindley wrote:

Conspiracy theory? Hardly.

Kath's remarks on Friday night were either:

a) a foolish outburst from a woman who, despite what else she might be, is no fool

or

b) a continuation of the spin tactics that have become a hallmark of the current regime

As you say we'll never know.

Why foolish? Can't she just have been honest about Child being extremely poor? Or is there always some hidden agenda and, that word all the Agar haters love, 'spin'.

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:34 pm  

tropical1 wrote:

Mr Childs reward for his performance last week is to Ref Wigan v dragons on Friday, and touch judge for Wakey on sunday!

Am i being cynical but isn't it funny how he very rarely gets a TV game hmmmmm is Mr Cummins trying to hide someones lack of ability???????????? (just my own little theory lol )

I happen to think he's a very talented touch judge, no lack of ability there.

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:35 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

As long as it doesn't drag our club through the mud.

If true it will believe me...The ref was poor no question there, however allegedly Agar verbally attacked him straight after the match (with plenty of independent witnesses in ear shot), allegedly he made the attack very personal as well.
Now I am all for complaining about refs, however I do not think any ref should be subjected to abuse from coaches or any-one for that matter.

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:36 pm  

berrigans bitch wrote:

If true it will believe me...The ref was poor no question there, however allegedly Agar verbally attacked him straight after the match (with plenty of independent witnesses in ear shot), allegedly he made the attack very personal as well.
Now I am all for complaining about refs, however I do not think any ref should be subjected to abuse from coaches or any-one for that matter.

I'd heard the same. All i will say is that if i used the type of language and personal assaults that Agar is rumoured to have used in my work place i'd be instantly dismissed.

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:38 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

I'd heard the same. All i will say is that if i used the type of language and personal assaults that Agar is rumoured to have used in my work place i'd be instantly dismissed.

Well yes, I never wanted to post what I heard was said, fecking disgraceful if true ....and I am inclined to believe the person who told me.

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:40 pm  

Agar's media reaction now on FC.TV

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:51 pm  

Dave's number 3 suggestion of having two referees would be a good start,

This weekend in one of the televised games I saw someone get up from being tackled and throw an elbow with the ball in his same hand and couldn't believe it went unseen by three people, what more important thing could they have all been watching apart from what the ball was doing?

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:52 pm  

tommyfromhull wrote:

Agar's media reaction now on FC.TV

What's he say mate, can't view it at work.

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:54 pm  

muddyboots wrote:

Dave's number 3 suggestion of having two referees would be a good start,

This weekend in one of the televised games I saw someone get up from being tackled and throw an elbow with the ball in his same hand and couldn't believe it went unseen by three people, what more important thing could they have all been watching apart from what the ball was doing?

Which links to point 4 really about not funding enough talented refs coming through. I guess there's a call to make though about whether to have 1 above average ref or 2 below average refs doing each SL game.