Re: screwed : Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:01 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

If I had any idea what you were on about, I might respond

Don't bother. It'll only be something about how refs make mistakes but everyone else makes loads more and how supporters are clueless.

Re: screwed : Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:01 pm  

justinho wrote:

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, sad thick losers.

shut up saddo

Re: screwed : Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:02 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

If I had any idea what you were on about, I might respond

translates into

"I know what he is on about and have no comeback."

: Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:03 pm  

hullbg wrote:

end of the day a decent team would not be arguing about one or two dubious calls. We are not a decent team and as such it has manifested in us claiming a try that might have been might have won us the match.

Currently at this level we are no where near good enough.

eeeeejut

Re: screwed : Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:03 pm  

Black and white legend wrote:

Do u mean like cookes hand touching the grass befoe he passed the ball to dobson for the opening try.tackle was completed and should have been ruled out

I'm an FC fan but sorry mate - his hand didn't touch the ground.

Re: screwed : Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:05 pm  

Andrea FC wrote:

shut up saddo

hahahahaha christ

Re: screwed : Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:07 pm  

BALROG wrote:

I'm an FC fan but sorry mate - his hand didn't touch the ground.

Agreed and the tackle on Tansey wasn't complete, yet again the home side got both decisions in their favour.

Re: screwed : Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:09 pm  

TKOAH wrote:

Agreed and the tackle on Tansey wasn't complete, yet again the home side got both decisions in their favour.

It was complete as soon as his ball carrying arm hit the deck while fox still had contact!!
I thought you were hard done by and vital decisions went against you but that wasn't one of them.

Re: screwed : Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:09 pm  

TKOAH wrote:

Agreed and the tackle on Tansey wasn't complete, yet again the home side got both decisions in their favour.

Now that I do agree with!!

: Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:10 pm  

forevafaithful wrote:

:roll: eeeeejut

Why?
Appears to speak a lot of sense. "Fans" of poor teams seem to claim poor refereeing costs them much more than fans of the better teams. Why is that? To try and disguise their teams own failings? The better teams take it on the chin and get on with it, the have a score denied, so what? Go and score two more.