Robbo4 wrote:
:lol:
I knew it wouldn't be long before you arrived.
So if that's the role why the frick would anyone want Westerman to play that role?
IMO we have been playing with 3 probs and Fitz has been asked to provide limited options as an extra passer of the ball. More recently Westerman has been asked to provide that additional passing and also kicking option. Now to me the role of the LF is a forward that provides an extra passing and kicking option. The player that most closely fits that role is Westerman, the fact he wasn't trundling the ball down the middle all match just means he wasn't playing the additional prop role. It is possible to take on the Attacking role of the LF whilst primarily occupying the right channel.
What I'm getting at is that people seem to believe that because Westerman was named at 13 we had changed our tactics. You hardly came across as knowing that yourself, until now. Although the cynic in me could think that you're back tracking.
For me, Fitz is not asked to provide any options as an extra passer, I think he does it off his own back to try and help.
Also for me, the attacking role of the loose forward has been replaced by the modern day FB, this includes attacking down
both sides, not just one. Westerman has not changed the way he's played all season and is coming back to the form he had before his injury. He's playing right sided 2nd row, and doing a good job.