: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:03 am  

Brett Seymour anyone?...

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:04 am  

Matty_HullFC wrote:

Is it balls, the reason they've over taken us is shrewd signings by the coach.

Without Hudgell and Lowe in the board room, the last part of your comment would not have happened as it was they who where responsible for bringing in said coach.

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:04 am  

Beardo wrote:

Brett Seymour anyone?...

Yes please

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:05 am  

Beardo wrote:

Brett Seymour anyone?...

No thanks - enough alcohol consumption at the club already - allegedly

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:11 am  

Chris28 wrote:

No thanks - enough alcohol consumption at the club already

True...but half cut he could put in a better performance than Thorman!...

1 - R.Horne
6 - Seymour
7 - Long

Doesnt seem so bad to me!...

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:12 am  

Standee wrote:

Knowing many people who have had dealings with him, I want Walker nowhere near FC thanks very much.

Fans do not always make good owners.

So you are going on hearsay rather than actual first hand dealings with the man, ok.

Would you question his loyalty/commitment to the club he has supported since being a kid, why does his loyalty/commitment differ from yours.

It's just my opinion on how I see it, there well 'may be' underlieing reasons why it would not be in the best interest of FC to have Walker there, but you are not in a position to make assumptions like you have, just because your mates dont like him.

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:19 am  

me 'n' our kid wrote:

So you are going on hearsay rather than actual first hand dealings with the man, ok.

Would you question his loyalty/commitment to the club he has supported since being a kid, why does his loyalty/commitment differ from yours.

It's just my opinion on how I see it, there well 'may be' underlieing reasons why it would not be in the best interest of FC to have Walker there, but you are not in a position to make assumptions like you have, just because your mates dont like him.

No, not at all, we are not talking "mates" here, we are talking family members who came across him in business and people who have actually worked for him, it isn't heresay in the slightest.

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:37 am  

ComeOnYouUll wrote:

And who would that be exactly? Tickle and Manu signed for 2007, Berrigan and Cusack 2008.

Tickle signed an extension about a month before Sharp was sacked. Radford and King re-signed under Agar.

When is Agar going to stop using excuses??

What did Brian Smith have to work with when he arrived? He made an average team into a good team by playing as a team not individuals. Something Mr Agar seems unable to do.

Also, as stated above if re-signing Radford, King & CUSACK as HIS signings are anything to go by we are well and truly f00ked.

All three of them should be in NL1, at best!!

Derek

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:41 am  

Standee wrote:

No, not at all, we are not talking "mates" here, we are talking family members who came across him in business and people who have actually worked for him, it isn't heresay in the slightest.

If you haven't met him yourself, it is, by definition, hearsay.

: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:43 am  

Derek Rigby wrote:

Also, as stated above if re-signing Radford, King & CUSACK as HIS signings are anything to go by we are well and truly f00ked.

All three of them should be in NL1, at best!!

Derek

Do you actually watch the game, Derek?