pmarrow wrote:
Pearson has said Agar is his man, to avoid himself looking stupid Pearson will wait till the end of the season to then say along the lines of "what I've seen has made me think we could do with a fresh change at coaching level" then he will get rid of Agar.
Did he, though? I thought he said Agar was the most important man as he was the
coach, i.e. he was saying that the coach is paramount.
Thought it was said to reassure us after the previous regime made it clear they thought a good team made success and the coach was not important?