: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:37 pm  

I think we looked a better outfit with Thorman at fullback. Lee was an able replacement. Maybe he's matured abit since last year. I'd be surprised if Agar splits up his precious Half-back pairing as it's been built up so much. Maybe Saints isn't the time to tinker but i think Hall is better off on the wing. I expect our new recruit will play fullback so we don't have to split them up but i would.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:38 pm  

The Kings of Hull wrote:

But so was Horne, honestly the blinkered Horney lovefest that goes on on this board is scary at times.

GROW UP
Horne is an influential player for Hull FC and im sick of repeating the reasons why when you clearly cant understand them.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:39 pm  

HULLMAD wrote:

look you implied Horne wasnt creative at all and that all he was was a runner.

Thats because he isn't a creative player. Put for instance Orford next to him who will be the creative player, then we wouldn't expect Horne to try and create as much, whereas with Thorman and Horne neither of them create much at all.

Although it would be nice to have two creative players, so the opposition wouldn't know where all the plays are coming from just the one player.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:39 pm  

bexandy-FC wrote:

I think we looked a better outfit with Thorman at fullback. Lee was an able replacement. Maybe he's matured abit since last year. I'd be surprised if Agar splits up his precious Half-back pairing as it's been built up so much. Maybe Saints isn't the time to tinker but i think Hall is better off on the wing. I expect our new recruit will play fullback so we don't have to split them up but i would.

apparently according to sky text Thorman will start at fullback, i thought also we looked better when Thorman moved to Fullback.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:40 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Thats because he isn't a creative player. Put for instance Orford next to him who will be the creative player, then we wouldn't expect Horne to try and create as much, whereas with Thorman and Horne neither of them create much at all.

Although it would be nice to have two creative players, so the opposition wouldn't know where all the plays are coming from just the one player.

see post below. not repeating myself again.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:40 pm  

HULLMAD wrote:

there you go again.

What else do you want me to say?

Horne doesn't create a hole lot does he.

When he starts creating chances, I won't have to put IF.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:41 pm  

HULLMAD wrote:

GROW UP
Horne is an influential player for Hull FC and im sick of repeating the reasons why when you clearly cant understand them.

Coming from a woman thats just spit her dummy out.

Horne is influential in that he is one of the few FC players that back other players up and he also as a very good running game but these have been missing the past few weeks.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:42 pm  

HULLMAD wrote:

GROW UP
Horne is an influential player for Hull FC and im sick of repeating the reasons why when you clearly cant understand them.

Your the one who doesn't seem to understand mate. You think Horne is a creative player when he clearly isn't!

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:42 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Thats because he isn't a creative player. Put for instance Orford next to him who will be the creative player, then we wouldn't expect Horne to try and create as much, whereas with Thorman and Horne neither of them create much at all.

Although it would be nice to have two creative players, so the opposition wouldn't know where all the plays are coming from just the one player.

Worked well in 1991.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:43 pm  

HULLMAD wrote:

YES when he has the right players with him, which at present he doesnt,

Horne needs a Cooke, Head, Smith alongside him.