: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:35 pm  

Danny 2 wrote:

why do you support the team

we have some very good centres

But none of the class of Gleeson if he were to become available.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:36 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

TBF i reckon he'll have a string of clubs after him and make no mistake his agent will have had a number of offers on the table by now. I would say that rovers are strong favourites to retain him but the salary might come into play here and they are going to have to release some players next season to make way for improved deals for him, Welham and younger players to meet the homegrown quota. This is before they even think of strengthening.

TBH hope it stays at rovers, really blossomed since going there fair play to Justin really devolped him as a player always had the raw ability, a very good player imo far better than Gardner

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:09 pm  

diamondgeezer wrote:

He was brilliant during his time at saints but as most have already said - not very consitant now.

I would prefer Hall to play in the centre with Yeamo. I would consider an approach for Fox at KR though as he is OCC at the end of the season. A really good British winger and would be alot more reliable than Calderwood.

Not a chance!

Would be great signing though.

Karmichael Hunt : Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:33 pm  

Available for next season for big bucks,is he worth a punt.Might cost a lot of money but he is such a glamour player that we would get the money back with extra bums on seats.(especially the girls) Lets aim high for a change and give the supporters something special instead of some of the run of the mill players we have signed in the last few years.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:36 pm  

Japan RU.

Re: Karmichael Hunt : Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:39 pm  

DABHAND wrote:

Available for next season for big bucks,is he worth a punt.Might cost a lot of money but he is such a glamour player that we would get the money back with extra bums on seats.(especially the girls) Lets aim high for a change and give the supporters something special instead of some of the run of the mill players we have signed in the last few years.

Not for me

Re: Karmichael Hunt : Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:40 pm  

The Brother wrote:

Not for me

I`d have him

Re: Karmichael Hunt : Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:42 pm  

*LISA* wrote:

I`d have him

and thats not just for hull you floozy,what would raynor think

[Karen]

Re: Karmichael Hunt : Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:50 pm  

*LISA* wrote:

I`d have him

Me too!!!

Phwoar!!!

Re: Karmichael Hunt : Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:52 pm  

Karen xx wrote:

Me too!!!

Phwoar!!!

knew you wouldnt be far behind