: Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:45 am  

Rupert Pupkin wrote:

As Sheldon has pointed out they are missing 2 key forwards who have been in good form, not so sure if they have alot of strength in depth in their forwards. The Hull forwards have started the season off well(so we hear)and thats really why I am predicting a Hull win.

I dont think my KR v Wakey prediction will be far off and I did state we would win at Saints

Hope that your are right.
Think you will win quite well against wakey. Good side they are, but probably shot with injuries for this game. I hope that I am wrong in that prediction!

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:48 am  

Rupert Pupkin wrote:

As Sheldon has pointed out they are missing 2 key forwards who have been in good form, not so sure if they have alot of strength in depth in their forwards. The Hull forwards have started the season off well(so we hear)and thats really why I am predicting a Hull win.

I dont think my KR v Wakey prediction will be far off and I did state we would win at Saints

Good for you. I'd be delighted with a win given we've got 6 out through injury and are really stretched in the backs. Wouldn't like to call it though.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:13 am  

Rupert Pupkin wrote:

Cant see you guys losing this one.

I can't pick a winner for our game yet, will be very tight either way.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:19 am  

if Hudds are missing a couple of props then i would play Moa.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:33 am  

Irregs #16 wrote:

if Hudds are missing a couple of props then i would play Moa.

Why??

Surely it would be better to play Maloney under those circumstances.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:42 am  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

Why??

Surely it would be better to play Maloney under those circumstances.

Because im more anxious to see Moa play than Maloney

Purely for selfish reasons

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:51 am  

Irregs #16 wrote:

Because im more anxious to see Moa play than Maloney

Purely for selfish reasons

Trouble is, if he has a bad game then everyone will be slating him calling him Hutch 2 which would be massively unfair.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:51 am  

Irregs #16 wrote:

Because im more anxious to see Moa play than Maloney

Purely for selfish reasons

Fair enough

I personally would like to see clubs giving British talent more of a chance when the circumstances arise, this being one of them.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:58 am  

PAUL M wrote:

Trouble is, if he has a bad game then everyone will be slating him calling him Hutch 2 which would be massively unfair.

The difference being that the club have not really increased our expectations of him. Hutch was said to be "awesome" from kick offs etc.

I think Hull fans, or should I say hope Hull fans will understand his recent lack of game time, and look for little positives rather than expect the finished article on Friday

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:20 am  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

Fair enough

I personally would like to see clubs giving British talent more of a chance when the circumstances arise, this being one of them.

I'd like to see the club playing the best player avaialable. if that's Maloney then great, if not then Moa should get a chance. I don't think anyone could criticise the club for bringing young British talent through, but it has to be balanced for the good of the team.

Having said that, unless Moa is in tip top condition then I can't see the sense in playing him on Friday