[Wanderer]

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sat Aug 13, 2011 9:35 am  

Double Movement wrote:

Where has the verdict information come from?

From a source close to Shaun.

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sat Aug 13, 2011 11:53 am  

Not the one who stitched him up. He was mate wasnt he !

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:54 pm  

Double Movement wrote:

Where has the verdict information come from? I can't find anything anywhere on the web. There's nothing on the Dons' website, and nothing on the Rugby Football League website. Has someone got inside information? If so, where is it from?

Information received from a excellent source.

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:56 pm  

The Supporters trust will be having a bucket collection at the next two home games, to raise money towards Shaun's fine.

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:08 pm  

Excellent. Shaun has been very loyal to this club and we should stick by him too.

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sun Aug 14, 2011 5:25 pm  

Got to say that I thought John Scarrow made his point perfectly after the game. There are questions that need to be answered, specifically from the RFL end. I'd like to think theres been transparency in the entire thing, but I doubt it.

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:05 pm  

rugbyman wrote:

Information received from a excellent source.

get the "scum" tomorrow probably be shouting from the rooftops how they cleaned up rugby league,

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:14 pm  

You've got to remember this is the RFL we're talking about. The RFL that comes out with poop ideas like Superleague franchising at the expense of heartland clubs while non-clubs like Paris and Crusaders have £Millions thrown at them only to fail.
The same RFL that banned Jamie Bloem for 2 years for using a banned substance whilst allowing two Bradford players (names escape me) to walk away having refused drugs tests.
Now Leaf is (alledgedly) given 18 months while Long and Gleeson were given 6 months (I think) for exactly the same offence.
The RFL is the most morally corrupt governing body in sport, they hit the smaller clubs whilst letting the big boys get away with whatever, and its about time these descrepancies in punishments for rule breaches were brought to the fore.
I could quite easily walk away from the game at the moment.

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:52 pm  

Don't walk away, Gargoyle. I understand how you feel.

We might not like a government but we don't leave the country.

We all need to be strong together for the good of the Dons and Shaun. The game of rugby league and the Dons are well worth being involved with, even if the RFL are off our Christmas card list.

We all need to stick together and be strong.

[Wanderer]

Re: Shaun Leaf verdict : Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:54 pm  

Gargoyle wrote:

You've got to remember this is the RFL we're talking about. The RFL that comes out with poop ideas like Superleague franchising at the expense of heartland clubs while non-clubs like Paris and Crusaders have £Millions thrown at them only to fail.
The same RFL that banned Jamie Bloem for 2 years for using a banned substance whilst allowing two Bradford players (names escape me) to walk away having refused drugs tests.
Now Leaf is (alledgedly) given 18 months while Long and Gleeson were given 6 months (I think) for exactly the same offence.
The RFL is the most morally corrupt governing body in sport, they hit the smaller clubs whilst letting the big boys get away with whatever, and its about time these descrepancies in punishments for rule breaches were brought to the fore.
I could quite easily walk away from the game at the moment.

Long got 3 months, Gleeson 4 months. Gleeson's ban was longer on the basis that he played in the game in question.

Mark Cass subsequently got a 12 month ban whilst on the Coaching staff at Oldham (again for placing bets).

We need to FULLY understand what Shaun was charged and found guilty of because short of the RFL simply imposing bigger bans each time, in this case the punishment seems (on what we know) to be harsh and disproportionate.

Shaun has been incredibly loyal to the Dons through some lean times and now it's our turn to show our support and repay that loyalty.