Re: Adam Walker : Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:31 am  

FFS

Re: Adam Walker : Wed Jun 01, 2016 10:51 am  

hull2524 wrote:

So didn't he do it ? Or was the person involved over 16 ? Honest question

Two daft questions.

Read the article, all charges have been dismissed.

Re: Adam Walker : Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:46 am  

so he didn't get his tackle out on the net then? all am saying is why the uck was he charged if he didn't do anything iffy? if that's the case he has been badly treated by the police etc,

Re: Adam Walker : Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:53 am  

hull2524 wrote:

so he didn't get his tackle out on the net then? all am saying is why the uck was he charged if he didn't do anything iffy? if that's the case he has been badly treated by the police etc,

Being charged isn't the same as being found guilty. Probably best to stop digging now and leave it.

Re: Adam Walker : Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:14 pm  

Am not digging, I was asking a serious question, what I was saying is why the hell did it even get to court? anyway just got my answer elseware so end of,