Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:11 pm  

Mild Rover wrote:

Decent advice, for all that I've just ignored it.

You can foe him as well. But tbf, at about 1 post per day, he isn't a massive problem at the moment, IMO.

They're not really breaking the AUP. At the moment, they're intent is unknown & their posts are open to peoples interpretation. It could be a legitimate question about Rovers' finances?

Some of the responses they get however, are definitely against the AUP, but unfortunately ignored by the Mods & setting the precedent that it's ok to name call/abuse on the site:

BiltonRobin wrote:

poor little duller

Hessle Rover wrote:

ball bag troll

TheRealist wrote:

Ballbag

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:19 pm  

Re Finances, I believe Rovers made a small profit in 2015, c£15k (thanks to Wembley).

Creditors standing at around £3.7m, most of which as MR said will be directors loans which aren't in any danger of having to be paid back anytime soon (if ever).

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:56 pm  

DGM wrote:

They're not really breaking the AUP. At the moment, they're intent is unknown & their posts are open to peoples interpretation. It could be a legitimate question about Rovers' finances?

Some of the responses they get however, are definitely against the AUP, but unfortunately ignored by the Mods & setting the precedent that it's ok to name call/abuse on the site:

Feeling the luv

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 4:26 pm  

DGM wrote:

They're not really breaking the AUP. At the moment, they're intent is unknown & their posts are open to peoples interpretation. It could be a legitimate question about Rovers' finances?

Some of the responses they get however, are definitely against the AUP, but unfortunately ignored by the Mods & setting the precedent that it's ok to name call/abuse on the site:

Modabee Alert!

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 4:37 pm  

Sandro II Terrorista wrote:

Modabee Alert!

No chance. Just noticed that kind of thing creeping into the site, it's unnecessary really. And let's face it, if it was an FC fan posting that it'd get dealt with.

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 4:56 pm  

I can't really say anything, most of my posts are insults, but then, I'm like that in real life as well...

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:56 pm  

DGM wrote:

They're not really breaking the AUP. At the moment, they're intent is unknown & their posts are open to peoples interpretation. It could be a legitimate question about Rovers' finances?

Some of the responses they get however, are definitely against the AUP, but unfortunately ignored by the Mods & setting the precedent that it's ok to name call/abuse on the site:

If you believe that was a genuine question then your a bigger idiot than him

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:58 pm  

DGM wrote:

:lol: No chance. Just noticed that kind of thing creeping into the site, it's unnecessary really. And let's face it, if it was an FC fan posting that it'd get dealt with.

HE IS AN HULL FAN and I'd go further than calling him a ball bag and say he's a prize c**t

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:05 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

HE IS AN HULL FAN and I'd go further than calling him a ball bag and say he's a prize c**t

It's Fun time!

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:17 pm  

DGM wrote:

They're not really breaking the AUP. At the moment, they're intent is unknown & their posts are open to peoples interpretation. It could be a legitimate question about Rovers' finances?

Some of the responses they get however, are definitely against the AUP, but unfortunately ignored by the Mods & setting the precedent that it's ok to name call/abuse on the site:

The only enjoyable thing about circus boy is he's so rubbish at being a troll its funny. His hilarious send up of an illiterate Rovers fan is on a par with Russ Abbot's Scotsman. Maybe he's a send up. But I doubt it.

Anyway posting about Rovers finances, relegation and promotion opportunities etc you'd expect some comeback of an unpleasant nature if your obviously on a wind up.


Time to flush this t#rd.


Is it your alter ego is it DGM?