Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:20 pm  

Billysmartscircus wrote:

Can anyone tell me how we are in a gud financiel position , NH said we need 10,000 to break even when we were in the top flite and we never acheeved it so we must have been losing money .So how come we are now financelly good . RRTR.

at the last meeting pearson said he needed 15,000 to break even and was 3.75 million into you and dosent even support you must be a bigger count than you

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:58 pm  

rover 2000 wrote:

at the last meeting pearson said he needed 15,000 to break even and was 3.75 million into you and dosent even support you must be a bigger count than you

If Billy is an FC troll, are you the Rovers version? You seem to have similar writing styles you do, you know.

Anyway, it's nearer £2.6m-£2.7m FC the club owe's Pearson in DL's. £3.7m is the figure Rovers owe in Directors Loan's. As MR said earlier, it really doesn't matter (to either club).

All the financial statements are available online, completely free, so feel free to have a look. Hull's 2016 accounts are due by the end of June 2017, so keep us posted with the results.

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:03 pm  

Do Go Multiply you shouldn't be on here egging this jerker on. burtons is right it could be you

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:30 pm  

Muller muller grundy the stones

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:30 pm  

rover 2000 wrote:

Do Go Multiply you shouldn't be on here egging this jerker on. burtons is right it could be you

I'm hardly egging them on. Responding with name calling and abuse would be egging them on though, if they are indeed a troll.

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:54 pm  

DGM wrote:

I'm hardly egging them on. Responding with name calling and abuse would be egging them on though, if they are indeed a troll.

If he doesn't like it he can always f##k off you seem more concerned than that plank

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:06 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

If he doesn't like it he can always f##k off you seem more concerned than that plank

You're missing my point Frankie. If they are a troll, then name calling and 'bites' are exactly what they're after isn't it?

As an example, there's always that annoying bloke down the pub, let's call him 'Craig'. All Craig craves is some attention, and he goes around the pub in his drunken state spouting nonsense to anyone that'll listen, much to the annoyance of everyone else. The best way to deal with it would be to ignore Craig and eventually he'll give up and do one. Relating that example to what we have with Billy, and you're effectively buying him a beer and asking him to sit down and join you.

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:10 pm  

DGM wrote:

I'm hardly egging them on. Responding with name calling and abuse would be egging them on though, if they are indeed a troll.

call it what you like. don't give it if you cannot take it on the kr site I like banter and peetaking , silly billy and east dull fc go beyond and are obsessive do it on the dullers site

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:20 pm  

Crivens

Re: Finances : Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:37 pm  

I am going to throw in my tenpenneth to this debate.

Billysmartscircus is a troll.

His posts are way too contrived by half. Someone with that level of deliberately contrived illiteracy would stay off a forum such as this, unless you welcome abuse as a badge of honour and feel a constant need to provoke reactions. Also strange that the demise of Easthullfc fan on here has seen the simultaneous reincarnation of a troll with a transparently diffident agenda and excessive loves of emoticons.

I am always suspicious of those who try a contrary approach to the usual, unless you're a genius at it like Goose.