Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:12 pm  

I think you will find the Championship more entertaining and a tougher division than perhaps you might imagine.
The consensus has been that inthe Qualifers SL teams have the advantage of playing more intense rugby over the season. But it seems that Championship teams can enter the 8s more refreshed and less busted...if they manage the season properly.
Despite my team Leigh winning promotion, I'm hoping the Ch continues to improve and really push the lower SL teams to improve as well

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:17 pm  

Promotion is a realistic, if not easy, aim. All depends on the squad now, and it's just doubled in size with Blair signing - Lunt can now play the ball to someone.

Another aim is a good cup run. Why? Not for the cup itself, lest it distract promotion hopes, but is the only way to test the teams ability against SL opposition mid way through the year.

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:26 pm  

Gallanteer wrote:

Promotion is a realistic, if not easy, aim. All depends on the squad now, and it's just doubled in size with Blair signing - Lunt can now play the ball to someone.

Another aim is a good cup run. Why? Not for the cup itself, lest it distract promotion hopes, but is the only way to test the teams ability against SL opposition mid way through the year.

Bang on. The cup shouldn't be dismissed next year. I'd hope and pray for a decent run, against lower tier superleague clubs. A good practice run before the main part of the year.

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:46 pm  

It's a bit disingenuous of hudge to bemoan players wanting to move on whilst at the same time using relegation as an opportunity to bin those he doesn't want and, no doubt, reduce contracts for those you want to keep who can't get a gig elsewhere. He does, of course, have previous for public petulance against players who are moving on to better clubs so it's to be expected but still poor IMO

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:01 pm  

I get where you are coming from Jake, but we all have people who have been employed with CV's that aren't backed up by their work ethic or ability, and by the same token we have those grafters who go under the radar and churn out good stuff constantly. Rovers are in a position where they can get rid of the bulk of the former, whilst struggling to retain the latter. Yes Hudge will use any means available to keep the better players and why not.

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:12 pm  

So basically, Hudge = good. Congratulations, you are blessed with Red & White genes and will go forth and prosper in later years. Or, Hudge = bad. Commiserations, you are a West Hull soap dodger who will consider dead rat a "treat".

Or something like that.

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 8:17 pm  

Don't even think about what they do to their grannie's...

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:28 pm  

DGM wrote:

But it's Hudgell & Co that have got you into this mess through pi$£ poor recruitment and cap management.

The five you mentioned all had good seasons. They're only really accountable for their own performances, why should they sacrifice earnings or playing at a higher level because other people failed to do their bit?

I admire those like Lunt & Blair who are staying on and prepared to battle next year to get Rovers back up, but I don't think those who decide to leave should be vilified for doing so.

Think your right here its the players family's they have to consider, also we do not know what Lunt was offered to stay or Blair they could of been offered the same wages as last years or an improvement which might just p.ss a few other player off, my guess is if you want to seriously keep hold of your best players you need to pay them the same or more than they where on before, because the lure of playing SL is a big one

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:32 pm  

Paul Cooke said on radio the other day he was looking to take a few Fc players on loan don't know who he did not say but I guess Abdul, Logan, could be in the mix they would be my guess what would you think of loaning some FC players do you think your management team would consider it and would Fc even offer them ?

Re: Realistic aims : Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:04 pm  

I'd rather you all just fecked off forever with your idiot uninformed opinions.