Re: Albert Kelly : Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:00 pm
barham red wrote:
Our club is in dire need of management and has been for years, to lay the current problems at the door of Peacock is ridiculous, he's not even been in the job for a year yet.
The current situation has stemmed from years of poor recruitment and retention, just looking at the current squad and thinking its at full cap says it all. Our last 3 coaches have been poor and the rot seemed to have set in once we went down the cheap ozzie route with Sandercock, now there are plenty that will tell you he was good with younger players blah, blah but in essence he was such a downer after Morgan that it seemed to rip the verve out of the club.
JM had gone stale but his stale was light years ahead of what has followed, Sandercock was the human cure for insomnia and brought a woe is me mentality with him, but followed the fad of Mcguire and Brown. Chessie was an unispired choice and just the cheap option again followed the fad of Wane and Anderson. Webster is a stop gap because the real target can't be gotten yet, should we have kept Chester? No he'd lost it, to say he's proved hes a good coach at Wakey is pushing it, he had a quick lift effect but they are beyond dire now and he would never have done that with us.
Peacocks role needs time and will never be a quick fix, most changes to management structure, culture, strategy and direction start with a noticeable step back wards before any forward movement is made, for us this step back may be over a cliff, but the alternative seems to be slipping over that same cliff more slowly.
If and its a big if we get through this situation we will be miles better for it, whatever the end result of this year we can't throw the baby out with the bathwater though
The current situation has stemmed from years of poor recruitment and retention, just looking at the current squad and thinking its at full cap says it all. Our last 3 coaches have been poor and the rot seemed to have set in once we went down the cheap ozzie route with Sandercock, now there are plenty that will tell you he was good with younger players blah, blah but in essence he was such a downer after Morgan that it seemed to rip the verve out of the club.
JM had gone stale but his stale was light years ahead of what has followed, Sandercock was the human cure for insomnia and brought a woe is me mentality with him, but followed the fad of Mcguire and Brown. Chessie was an unispired choice and just the cheap option again followed the fad of Wane and Anderson. Webster is a stop gap because the real target can't be gotten yet, should we have kept Chester? No he'd lost it, to say he's proved hes a good coach at Wakey is pushing it, he had a quick lift effect but they are beyond dire now and he would never have done that with us.
Peacocks role needs time and will never be a quick fix, most changes to management structure, culture, strategy and direction start with a noticeable step back wards before any forward movement is made, for us this step back may be over a cliff, but the alternative seems to be slipping over that same cliff more slowly.
If and its a big if we get through this situation we will be miles better for it, whatever the end result of this year we can't throw the baby out with the bathwater though
Hope your right Barham. As long as you stay up it doesn't matter how.