Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:52 am  

worthing wire wrote:

:CLAP: Bloody superb effort from Fev. A powerful argument against the SL licencing system in my view.

i totaly agree very well done fev, a excellent effort in my opinion, you sure deserve a S/L licence,

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:05 am  

It was a typical bruising cup tie with total commitment from all the Fev boys. You can be rightly proud of their performance and it could only benefit your super league licensing bid. Big well done and good luck for the rest of the season and the next licensing bid.

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:30 pm  

castigersdave wrote:

na wakefield would easily beat them if they were both in super league, because it isnt just a one-off game, wakefield would have better players and more experienced with super league

But targeting games is exactly what John Kear said Wakey did towards the end of last season after Trinity took Cas all the way - they'd gone easy the week before because they wanted to put up a good show against Cas. What's the difference? If SL had P&R clubs wouldn't be able to do that, but it doesn't so they can.

[Wildthing]

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:53 pm  

daveydj17 wrote:

:lol: typical wakey, have too travel to see a proper side play.

Are you like, 12?

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sat Apr 28, 2012 4:47 pm  

ok fev raised their game twice, fair enough they were a better team against us, but they wouldnt be able to do that week in week out in SL, they couldnt beat HKR,salford or wakey or be 6 points away from saints with half a youth team.

You deserve a license, but not in space of Cas or Wakey, you shouldve come up isntead of Widnes I grant you that, but you can't suddenly say your better than us because of a one-off game

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sat Apr 28, 2012 4:57 pm  

castigersdave wrote:

but you can't suddenly say your better than us because of a one-off game

I wouldn't ever be so facile as to suggest that. I believe were better than you lot because of a whole host of other reasons!!!

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:00 pm  

castigersdave wrote:

but they wouldnt be able to do that week in week out in SL

unlike c*s an wakey of course

[Wildthing]

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:46 am  

spener wrote:

unlike c*s an wakey of course

Exactly, 1 week we put in a very strong performance to beat a good Catalans side the following week we
capitulated against a far weaker London side.

The lower and mid table SL teams do this week in week out!!!

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:50 am  

Cas did it 7 weeks in a row badly and 4 weeks good, so if thats not consistency I don't know what is

Re: CHALLENGE CUP : Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:12 am  

castigersdave wrote:

I don't know

and there's the rub Dave!!