Re: Leigh game : Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:57 am  

griff1998 wrote:

Sky give us £100000 a year.

How would you replace that ?

Thats what the RFL told the press. In reality it will be far less than that, ask your club. For starters the RFL also state they meet the costs of your trip to toulouse.....no they don't, its deducted from your starting figure of £100000. I think you also have to employ people in certain positions who can show a clear improvement in for example income streams. If you can't theres another chunk you don't get.

"RFL announce £100000 for each Championship club." Lies, more lies, and damn lies

Re: Leigh game : Wed Aug 11, 2010 6:11 pm  

DemonUK wrote:

I think you also have to employ people in certain positions who can show a clear improvement in, for example, income streams.

And what's bad about that ?

Why don't you just get your begging bowl out ?

Why do people expect everything to drop in their lap with no work these days ?

Re: Leigh game : Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:40 am  

We are simply following the example set by our superiors in SL.

Oh and whats bad about that? Ask the Championship clubs

Re: Leigh game : Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:25 pm  

DemonUK wrote:

We are simply following the example set by our superiors in SL.

Oh and whats bad about that? Ask the Championship clubs

I'm asking you.

Re: Leigh game : Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:16 pm  

OK

1 How do you prove the person you have employed has improved the income streams, which incidentally are probably as high as they'll get anyway.

2 You employ someone, the RL say you have not met the conditions, so money deducted, however you still have to pay the person you employed.

3 They will deduct at every opportunity. Ask Despot Des at Barrow, who were billed for extra floodlights needed by SKY for a televised game. Somewhere in the region of 20k I seem to remember

4 The whole point of my previous post is people seem to think the RFL just write a cheque for £100k, when actually the RFL look to every opportunity to not write a cheque at all.

5 Any club directors reading this will probably confirm that they get no where near £100k from the RFL

"I'm asking you" - a bit confrontational is that. You are Richard Lewis However I have told you what I think I know. If you want to know the facts from the horses mouth, ask your club directors.

Re: Leigh game : Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:28 am  

DemonUK wrote:

OK

1 How do you prove the person you have employed has improved the income streams, which incidentally are probably as high as they'll get anyway.

2 You employ someone, the RL say you have not met the conditions, so money deducted, however you still have to pay the person you employed.

3 They will deduct at every opportunity. Ask Despot Des at Barrow, who were billed for extra floodlights needed by SKY for a televised game. Somewhere in the region of 20k I seem to remember

4 The whole point of my previous post is people seem to think the RFL just write a cheque for £100k, when actually the RFL look to every opportunity to not write a cheque at all.

5 Any club directors reading this will probably confirm that they get no where near £100k from the RFL

"I'm asking you" - a bit confrontational is that. You are Richard Lewis However I have told you what I think I know. If you want to know the facts from the horses mouth, ask your club directors.

GO ON SON !!!! GET HIM TOLD !!!!

Re: Leigh game : Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:41 pm  

Tell him what ?

What I already know ?

How about telling us why you think the RFL and Sky should give you £100000 without any conditions? Clubs have got such a good record of spending it wisely, haven't they?

Re: Leigh game : Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:47 pm  

Leyther_Matt wrote:

Sky are usually slow to update their own site, believe it or not!

I believe there have been big queues for tickets on matchday - anyone know if there are plans for tickets to be sent to Leigh to sell in advance to avoid any problems?

they have been

Re: Leigh game : Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:08 pm  

.

Re: Leigh game : Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:07 pm  

EAGLEBLADE II wrote:

.

Whole-heartedly agree.