FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Photography thread 11.02
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Administrator25122No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 05 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jul 17 01:3911th May 17 20:59LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Aleph Green

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:26 pm  
Those are not bad photographs. Did you shoot native jpeg or convert from RAW?

Generally speaking the software you get with the camera is pretty good at RAW conversion. Technically speaking it should provide better results than Adobe Camera Raw (which is the plug-in for both Elements and Photoshop) because it is the manufacturer's own software. No one knows the peculiarities of how cameras create RAW files better than makers so the algorithms used should be the most finely tuned of the lot. I say SHOULD because these days Canon & Nikon etc. tend to palm bundled software off to third-party developers in whose hands pretty much anything can happen.

Adobe Camera Raw is a superb piece of software, tho. I mean, it's entirely possible to handle ALL post-processing within this plug-in (including more complex activities such as airbrushing, adding neutral density filters, gradients, masks, lens correction, perspective shifts etc.) without ever needing to drop the image into the parent software (whether it be Elements of Photoshop).

On the subject of lenses. Thirty years ago you'd certainly think twice about using third-party non-proprietary lenses such as Tamron or Sigma. Very often the reverse-engineering process which allowed them to "talk" to the camera and work in unison with the camera's highly sensitive light-metering systems was flawed to say the least. Worse still the lenses themselves yielded all kinds of unwanted effects such as image distortion and chromatic aberration.

These days, however, the build quality is significantly better. Sigma, Tamron, Tokina etc. all use high-precision laser C&C to cut their bodies and glass down to very precise tolerances. I have a couple of the higher-end Sigma "EX" lenses and the build quality is definitely as good if not better than standard Canon lenses - if not quite up to Canon's pro series. Unless you are really, really picky about geometric distortion it's perfectly possible to get by with even entry level stuff right up to professional level.

I mean, I have several very expensive pro-level "L" series Canon lenses. Whilst they yield demonstrably cleaner images with better bokeh, lower chroma etc. I could easily live without all of such. The only drawback to entry level and third party lenses is build quality. Canon's "L" series are built to last with all-metal bodies and full weatherproofing. That's something I can't do without when I'm shooting professionally outside in bad weather. And you have the confidence in knowing that if you drop them on the floor they are not going to explode into a million pieces. It's the same story with my cameras. I could quite easily get by using a 700D or whatever they are named these days. But these polycarbonate bodies just can't match the durability of my Canon 7D and 5D MKII.

One welcome development in the field of photography is the arrival of the Chinese and their heavily subsidised equipment. For years Chinese equipment was nothing short of a joke. But recently they've really got their act together. A good example would be Yongnuo and their astonishingly cheap flashes and transmitters.

For years if you wanted to buy a decent Canon flash you either had to fork out £220+ for the standard models and anywhere up to £500 for their top end stuff. Meanwhile a set of professional wireless triggers would set you back the best part of £800.

Admittedly the Yongnuo stuff isn't built to the same rock-solid Canon standard. But they are close. And getting closer. However, it's on COST where Yongnuo really kick ass. For the price of ONE of Canon's top end flashes I can probably buy EIGHT Yongnuo strobes all with built in wireless receivers. Sure, they won't last as long but who cares? Break one and you've still got another seven left in the bag.
Dally 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member14845No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Oct 21 15:0122nd Jul 21 09:42LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:38 pm  
They were JPEGs. Maybe I should take another look at the camera's software to see if it processes RAW files! If I recall the software crashes on my computer and I am using my wife's software from a compact camera.

Back to the cheap lens, yes those pictures are reasonable and the cat one pretty good. But, shooting at a longer range results to date have been poor.

On a different note, I am wondering whether a Sigma 150-500mm lens (c. £600) would be worth it? I know their top of the range version (more expensive) can produce petty impressive results, but I am not sure about spending £600 on something which may not be top notch. Do you have any experience of this particular lens?

Sadly, Pentax lenses are expensive - c. £1,000 for a 300mm f4 prime lens. Maybe I should have transferred over to Canon / Nikon when I got my last camera! But the Pentax K3 came out better in reviews than the equivalent Canon / Nikon cameras and is a great top end consumer level camera.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Administrator25122No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 05 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jul 17 01:3911th May 17 20:59LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Aleph Green

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Mon Jul 13, 2015 10:26 pm  
Dally wrote:
On a different note, I am wondering whether a Sigma 150-500mm lens (c. £600) would be worth it? I know their top of the range version (more expensive) can produce petty impressive results, but I am not sure about spending £600 on something which may not be top notch. Do you have any experience of this particular lens?


I've never used it. But I would have no concerns about doing so. Of course I always advise people to buy the best glass they can afford. But unless image sharpness and lens distortion are absolutely critical issues I wouldn't waste the money. Professional level lenses are meant for professionals. I'm not saying amateurs should steer clear but you really need to know a good deal about photography before you'll be able to get the best out of a professional lens.

I've seen people throw two grand at a professional 18-55mm or a 22mm-80mm workhorse lens and a 70/200mm intermediate zoom and yet they scarcely know how to operate their own camera. I haven't the heart to tell them they've wasted their money.

I'd definitely be wary of spending big on a 500mm lens. Unless you are a dedicated wildlife photographer shooting at least once per week you're really not going to get a lot of work out of it. My 70-200mm cost me a grand and yet I doubt I shoot more than 5% of my photographs with it. If you are going to invest big money pile it into an everyday use zoom. At least then you are getting value for money.

Sadly, Pentax lenses are expensive - c. £1,000 for a 300mm f4 prime lens. Maybe I should have transferred over to Canon / Nikon when I got my last camera! But the Pentax K3 came out better in reviews than the equivalent Canon / Nikon cameras and is a great top end consumer level camera.


I began with Canon - simply because it was a big name and the entry level bodies were affordable. I briefly moved over to the Sony Alpha system but even though I really rated the Alpha bodies the choice of lenses was very limited.

I have some very real criticisms of Canon (and Nikon) especially in relation to pricing. But you can't knock Canon's catalog of lenses. For instance I don't know any manufacturer who currently offers FOUR separate professional-standard 70-200mm lenses.

So whilst other manufacturers are undoubtedly forging ahead of Canon and Nikon in terms of camera bodies - all of them are way behind on glass. And as any photographer will tell you - glass is the most important factor when buying into any camera system. Good glass lasts you a lifetime whereas camera bodies are often outdated within 18 months.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star4641
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 25 201014 years186th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Mar 24 08:2514th Mar 24 11:07LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
WF4
Signature
"Back home we got a taxidermy man. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him."

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Tue Jul 14, 2015 7:54 am  
Diavolo Rosso wrote:
Anybody know how to replicate the look from the 1980s photos in this book?

http://www.hoxtonminipress.com/products ... oto-book-6

I'm not entirely sure exactly what the technical term is for what I'm trying to replicate, but I'm basically trying to get the same look/feel which I presume is a function of how the camera handled the light/processing of the photo. Any thoughts?


It's something which can be done in Photoshop but it takes an understanding of how film/photos degrade and how colours are 'lost' over the years. Generally speaking, aged 1980s photos tend to have a yellow hue to the whites and a loss of colour in the blues which gives the photos more of a red/yellow/magenta hue. The easiest and most basic way is to use the 'Selective Colour' adjustment layer in Photoshop. This allows you to alter the colour properties of each colour in the image individually. You have to be careful not to over do it though as it can look too heavily processed. Subtle adjustments often work best.
Diavolo Rosso wrote:
Anybody know how to replicate the look from the 1980s photos in this book?

http://www.hoxtonminipress.com/products ... oto-book-6

I'm not entirely sure exactly what the technical term is for what I'm trying to replicate, but I'm basically trying to get the same look/feel which I presume is a function of how the camera handled the light/processing of the photo. Any thoughts?


It's something which can be done in Photoshop but it takes an understanding of how film/photos degrade and how colours are 'lost' over the years. Generally speaking, aged 1980s photos tend to have a yellow hue to the whites and a loss of colour in the blues which gives the photos more of a red/yellow/magenta hue. The easiest and most basic way is to use the 'Selective Colour' adjustment layer in Photoshop. This allows you to alter the colour properties of each colour in the image individually. You have to be careful not to over do it though as it can look too heavily processed. Subtle adjustments often work best.
Dally 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member14845No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Oct 21 15:0122nd Jul 21 09:42LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Tue Jul 14, 2015 3:25 pm  
Mugwump wrote:
I've never used it. But I would have no concerns about doing so. Of course I always advise people to buy the best glass they can afford. But unless image sharpness and lens distortion are absolutely critical issues I wouldn't waste the money. Professional level lenses are meant for professionals. I'm not saying amateurs should steer clear but you really need to know a good deal about photography before you'll be able to get the best out of a professional lens.

I've seen people throw two grand at a professional 18-55mm or a 22mm-80mm workhorse lens and a 70/200mm intermediate zoom and yet they scarcely know how to operate their own camera. I haven't the heart to tell them they've wasted their money.

I'd definitely be wary of spending big on a 500mm lens. Unless you are a dedicated wildlife photographer shooting at least once per week you're really not going to get a lot of work out of it. My 70-200mm cost me a grand and yet I doubt I shoot more than 5% of my photographs with it. If you are going to invest big money pile it into an everyday use zoom. At least then you are getting value for money.

I began with Canon - simply because it was a big name and the entry level bodies were affordable. I briefly moved over to the Sony Alpha system but even though I really rated the Alpha bodies the choice of lenses was very limited.

I have some very real criticisms of Canon (and Nikon) especially in relation to pricing. But you can't knock Canon's catalog of lenses. For instance I don't know any manufacturer who currently offers FOUR separate professional-standard 70-200mm lenses.

So whilst other manufacturers are undoubtedly forging ahead of Canon and Nikon in terms of camera bodies - all of them are way behind on glass. And as any photographer will tell you - glass is the most important factor when buying into any camera system. Good glass lasts you a lifetime whereas camera bodies are often outdated within 18 months.


In my case I take 95%+ with at least a 200mm lens and usually 300mm (biggest I have) as I principally photograph wildlife, especially birds. I have only put on a "standard" lens for about 5 minutes in the last year! Yes, I agree that lenses are more important than the box that holds them but as I was not prepared to spend several thousand pounds on a professional standard camera the K3 came out best for my needs - fully waterproof, robust, good IQ, 8 fps. etc. Problem is I like to take close ups (often necessarily cropped) of birds and so the kit lenses that came with the camera, whilst good, are not good enough for the perfectionist in me!
Dally 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member14845No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Oct 21 15:0122nd Jul 21 09:42LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Sat Jul 25, 2015 4:21 pm  
OK I took the plunge and have ordered a Pentax 300mm lens. Ordered online from a Dutch company as about £250 less than best UK online price. Just hope it does the business.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Captain434No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 19 20159 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
27th Aug 16 20:4417th Oct 15 17:57LINK
Milestone Posts
250
500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
In the van with my boys
Signature
“All the good music has already been written by people with wigs and stuff.”
Frank Zappa

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:02 pm  
Ok, so i'm wanting to offload my Canon Eos 60D, i don't really want to put it on eBay due to their expensive fees as every penny is needed for a full frame upgrade, so i am wondering if there are any other sites that are safe for selling it on, Gumtree is no good as i live on the Cumbrian coast far from civilisation lol, any help would be most welcome, thanks
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star4641
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 25 201014 years186th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Mar 24 08:2514th Mar 24 11:07LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
WF4
Signature
"Back home we got a taxidermy man. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him."

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:49 am  
The Mustard Tiger wrote:
Ok, so i'm wanting to offload my Canon Eos 60D, i don't really want to put it on eBay due to their expensive fees as every penny is needed for a full frame upgrade, so i am wondering if there are any other sites that are safe for selling it on, Gumtree is no good as i live on the Cumbrian coast far from civilisation lol, any help would be most welcome, thanks


How much do you want for it? Is it body only?
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Administrator25122No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 05 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jul 17 01:3911th May 17 20:59LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Aleph Green

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Mon Aug 31, 2015 2:15 pm  
Image
This post contains an image, if you are the copyright owner and would like this image removed then please contact support@rlfans.com
Dally 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member14845No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200122 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Oct 21 15:0122nd Jul 21 09:42LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Photography thread 11.02 : Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:02 pm  
Nice one.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 231 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
3m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
55964
3m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
34250
9m
Rd 6 I Cas A
Rockinhorse
21
9m
WIRE YED Prediction Competition Catalans Home
Uncle Rico
11
9m
Saints a
Cherry_Warri
13
11m
TV Games - Not Hull
Steve0
1378
20m
Fevround 2
Wildthing
86
28m
2024 Southstandercom Prediction Competition Week 6
taxi4stevesm
23
31m
The Bulls away
Brew
7
38m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Jack Burton
8703
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
32s
Other Championship Clubs
Trojan Horse
97
45s
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Jack Burton
8703
47s
The official Leon Hayes Thread
Snaggletooth
9
50s
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
34250
1m
The Good Friday Derby Massacre
Dave K.
115
1m
Shopping list for 2025
Tarquin Fueg
405
1m
Challenge Cup 6th Round
Miserybusine
56
1m
WIRE YED Prediction Competition Catalans Home
Uncle Rico
11
2m
Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE
Zig
1933
3m
Max Wood on loan to Bradford 2 weeks
rubber ducki
7
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
The Wigan Way - New Podcast - Chairman Special
Jukesays
1
TODAY
Dons v Swinton Lions 30 June 2024
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Squad for Sheffield
AdamH
1
TODAY
London Away
Fartown58
1
TODAY
The Bulls away
Brew
7
TODAY
The official Leon Hayes Thread
Snaggletooth
9
TODAY
Saints a
Cherry_Warri
13
TODAY
Leon Ruan signs on loan
Jemmo
2
TODAY
Wardle
Jo Jumbuck
3
TODAY
Huddersfield - Home
BigTime
5
TODAY
Max Wood on loan to Bradford 2 weeks
rubber ducki
7
TODAY
Jake Wardle 5 Year deal
Zig
22
TODAY
No grade A for 2025 for Trinity
imwakefieldt
19
TODAY
Cup Quarter Final TV Arrangements
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Rd 6 I Cas A
Rockinhorse
21
TODAY
WIRE YED Prediction Competition Catalans Home
Uncle Rico
11
TODAY
Spare Tickets Friday
Azul
3
TODAY
RL Podcast
AgbriggAmble
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
Captain Hook
34
TODAY
2024 Challenge Cup Quarter Final Draw
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Cup Quarter Final TV Arrangeme..
471
2024 Challenge Cup Quarter Fin..
584
Easy Does It For The Dragons A..
522
Warrington Demolish London For..
638
Leigh Leopards Beat Plucky Fea..
688
Saints Triumph Over Disappoint..
660
Easy Win for the Wolves Over L..
912
Dragons Condemn Castleford To ..
893
Leigh Leopards Secure First Po..
1041
St Helens Tame The Rhinos To W..
1009
Wigan Warriors Come From Behin..
1066
Betfred Championship and Leagu..
1055
2024 Challenge Cup Sixth Round..
3829
Featherstone Win Extra Time Cu..
1177
Dragons Triumph Over Hull FC t..
1057
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Table 'boards.stats_fixtures' doesn't exist