FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Latest on NM
TRB 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach10926
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 18 200519 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
16th Dec 21 22:5121st Feb 19 13:49LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Wacky Field
Signature
"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"

For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto //www.swag-online.co.uk

For the latest details on the Supporters Trust, log onto //wakefield.rlfans.com

Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 8:56 pm  
Update from 8th October:
One of our colleagues attended the WMDC Cabinet Meeting in Ossett this week. The meeting was attended by around a dozen Wakefield supporters, anxious to find out the latest from WMDC regarding the recent Planning Application from Yorkcourt / Henry Boot regarding the proposed Kitwave facility at Newmarket

The question was asked during the Cabinet meeting, however Cllr Box refused to answer, other than suggesting that the council and club were in ‘sensitive negotiations’, and instead invited those interested to gather after the meeting and that the Head of Planning, Neil Rodgers, would be able to answer the questions raised.
A number of questions were asked of Neil, most of which he could easily answer. However, he mentioned that they were dealing with ‘Trusts’ in the plural, to which we sought clarification and he confirmed that there were more than one Trust and he is in talks with them. He was also asked if Sir Rodney Walker was involved, to which he refused to say one way or other.
Form the discussion it would appear that the issue between the initial Outline Planning Application Public Inquiry and the subsequent LDF (Local Development Framework) Public Inquiry is the area in which the council is most uncomfortable in that there is a belief that Yorkcourt can work within the LDF without the need for the OPP. We would note that the fact that both were running around the same time was known to both Government officers conducting the relevant Inquiries and both not only made reference to the other but also took these facts into account in their deliberations.
Neil Rodgers then went on to say that the pending decision was contentious and the council would seek independent legal advice. It was then pointed out that the council had sought ‘Legal Advice’ in relation to whether to consider the Newcold site as being outside of the catchment of the Unilateral Undertaking (Section 106 agreement) and that despite Freedom of Information requests they had been unable to provide evidence of any such ‘Advice’ having been taken.
Neil was then asked outright for a straight ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer - is there a chance of the Newcold development going back into the contribution area. He categorically said no chance whatsoever!!
All of this is also now made more complicated still by the plans for HS2 and when this was mentioned he said that although things were still vague, it is possible that it could cut through the site and make it impossible to leave enough land ever to develop so as to achieve the 60000 total!
Other things mentioned was that even though they have this recent letter from Gateleys they are still open to giving Yorkcourt planning for houses (on the proposed Stadium site) in order to help them gather more money to contribute towards a Community Stadium.
Thereafter it appeared as though he just wanted to blame the Inspector and the Government and a poor 106 as the reason for the non-delivery of the Community Stadium.

The above is just a potted version of the discussion. It does however confirm that it would appear that the council are reluctant to turn down the current Planning Application, although a formal decision can only be made by the Planning Committee themselves.
At the meeting we were also advised of something we had heard before, but never able to verify, which is that Yorkcourt were involved in the delivery of the Manchester Arena – we would appreciate someone confirming this if they have any knowledge or evidence of it.
lad13 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1733No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 16 200519 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
22nd Dec 21 09:4221st Dec 21 19:16LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
on the way to armarillo
Signature
I'm still laughing at Cas!!!

Re: Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 9:03 pm  
Also to add - he said Manni was keen to sell bv but as regards to redevelopment any funds from wmdc could not be directly to any private business - ie trinity or 88m and suggested that some kind of plan to buy the ground & wmdc to loan the stadium trust funds would be an idea to be discussed. Added that the c700k suggested yc pay would be a pro rata payment basis from the kitwave development only - butvwasnt hopeful of this. Took a view that yc would only have to start a stadium build when the units etc have a 60% occupancy. Confirmed as above that the newcold fridge was outside any footage for the trigger points.
RankPostsTeam
Club Captain817No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 26 20186 years219th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Apr 24 21:5829th Mar 24 20:50LINK
Milestone Posts
500
1000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 9:46 pm  
TRB wrote:
Update from 8th October:
One of our colleagues attended the WMDC Cabinet Meeting in Ossett this week. The meeting was attended by around a dozen Wakefield supporters, anxious to find out the latest from WMDC regarding the recent Planning Application from Yorkcourt / Henry Boot regarding the proposed Kitwave facility at Newmarket

The question was asked during the Cabinet meeting, however Cllr Box refused to answer, other than suggesting that the council and club were in ‘sensitive negotiations’, and instead invited those interested to gather after the meeting and that the Head of Planning, Neil Rodgers, would be able to answer the questions raised.
A number of questions were asked of Neil, most of which he could easily answer. However, he mentioned that they were dealing with ‘Trusts’ in the plural, to which we sought clarification and he confirmed that there were more than one Trust and he is in talks with them. He was also asked if Sir Rodney Walker was involved, to which he refused to say one way or other.
Form the discussion it would appear that the issue between the initial Outline Planning Application Public Inquiry and the subsequent LDF (Local Development Framework) Public Inquiry is the area in which the council is most uncomfortable in that there is a belief that Yorkcourt can work within the LDF without the need for the OPP. We would note that the fact that both were running around the same time was known to both Government officers conducting the relevant Inquiries and both not only made reference to the other but also took these facts into account in their deliberations.
Neil Rodgers then went on to say that the pending decision was contentious and the council would seek independent legal advice. It was then pointed out that the council had sought ‘Legal Advice’ in relation to whether to consider the Newcold site as being outside of the catchment of the Unilateral Undertaking (Section 106 agreement) and that despite Freedom of Information requests they had been unable to provide evidence of any such ‘Advice’ having been taken.
Neil was then asked outright for a straight ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer - is there a chance of the Newcold development going back into the contribution area. He categorically said no chance whatsoever!!
All of this is also now made more complicated still by the plans for HS2 and when this was mentioned he said that although things were still vague, it is possible that it could cut through the site and make it impossible to leave enough land ever to develop so as to achieve the 60000 total!
Other things mentioned was that even though they have this recent letter from Gateleys they are still open to giving Yorkcourt planning for houses (on the proposed Stadium site) in order to help them gather more money to contribute towards a Community Stadium.
Thereafter it appeared as though he just wanted to blame the Inspector and the Government and a poor 106 as the reason for the non-delivery of the Community Stadium.

The above is just a potted version of the discussion. It does however confirm that it would appear that the council are reluctant to turn down the current Planning Application, although a formal decision can only be made by the Planning Committee themselves.
At the meeting we were also advised of something we had heard before, but never able to verify, which is that Yorkcourt were involved in the delivery of the Manchester Arena – we would appreciate someone confirming this if they have any knowledge or evidence of it.

Don’t care which trust they talk to and whose on what trust, just want a fit for purpose stadium for our City and Club.

Up the Trin
wtid71 
RankPostsTeam
International Star522No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 24 201311 years316th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Oct 21 20:2320th Sep 21 13:53LINK
Milestone Posts
500
1000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 10:01 pm  
Wakefield City wrote:
Don’t care which trust they talk to and whose on what trust, just want a fit for purpose stadium for our City and Club.

Up the Trin


Well I for one put all my trust in those in the Community Trust that have worked tirelessly on behalf of us fans for years , giving up probably thousands of hours of their own time to get the stadium the city of Wakefield was promised. If the council is now talking to Walker god help us as the only person he is ever serving is himself.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4550
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 30 200815 years215th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
18th Apr 24 05:0812th Apr 24 14:38LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
The sunny side of Wakey
Signature
Wakefields roller coaster ride continues.

Re: Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 10:11 pm  
wtid71 wrote:
Well I for one put all my trust in those in the Community Trust that have worked tirelessly on behalf of us fans for years , giving up probably thousands of hours of their own time to get the stadium the city of Wakefield was promised. If the council is now talking to Walker god help us as the only person he is ever serving is himself.

Likewise from me. The Community Trust are the ones that have fought this battle and they are the ones I want to succeed.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Captain1172No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 19 20168 years283rd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Apr 24 20:3810th Apr 24 19:14LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 10:23 pm  
You should care which "Trust" they talk to.
One will deliver (community), the other "trust" will please itself.
I hesitate to actually call it a "trust" for fear of giving credence to the idea it actually exists.
We know what it is and it ain't no trust.
JINJER 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach7388
JoinedServiceReputation
May 03 200519 years283rd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Apr 24 22:2916th Apr 24 15:31LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
WF6,a small town in Wakefield
Signature
Twitter...@GINGERWILDCAT

Re: Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 10:25 pm  
Wakefield City wrote:
Don’t care which trust they talk to and whose on what trust, just want a fit for purpose stadium for our City and Club.

Up the Trin

If for any reason Walkers trust got involved and usurped the Community trust I'd never watch Trinity again, it would be the end of my love affair with our great club.
RankPostsTeam
International Star2481
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 31 201410 years267th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Apr 24 14:2830th Mar 24 19:12LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 11:08 pm  
JINJER wrote:
If for any reason Walkers trust got involved and usurped the Community trust I'd never watch Trinity again, it would be the end of my love affair with our great club.


I for one wouldn't blame you but if it did happen then it would be time for the RFL to step in and put some leverage on all involved. Keep the faith mate. :CLAP:
JINJER 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach7388
JoinedServiceReputation
May 03 200519 years283rd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Apr 24 22:2916th Apr 24 15:31LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
WF6,a small town in Wakefield
Signature
Twitter...@GINGERWILDCAT

Re: Latest on NM : Tue Oct 09, 2018 11:38 pm  
newgroundb4wakey wrote:
I for one wouldn't blame you but if it did happen then it would be time for the RFL to step in and put some leverage on all involved. Keep the faith mate. :CLAP:

I've been keeping the faith ground wise for over ten years now mate and I'm worn out with it, I can't imagine how Sandal cat and TRB cope with it, they're either Angels or not wired up right. :lol:

Ps, that was a joke. :wink:
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach13483
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 26 200617 years64th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
18th Apr 24 06:1217th Apr 24 10:49LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
No bowl, stick, STICK!
Signature
1/10

Re: Latest on NM : Wed Oct 10, 2018 6:21 am  
Wakefield City wrote:
Don’t care which trust they talk to and whose on what trust, just want a fit for purpose stadium for our City and Club.

Up the Trin

I understand what you are saying and we shouldn't cut our nose off to spite our face but you've got one trust who will work/have worked tirelessly to secure community facilities as opposed to another 'trust' that's in it to line their own pockets and are not interested in delivering a new stadium.
Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beamer, Belle Vue, Bullseye, cocker, happyjack, JINJER, Khlav Kalash, REDWHITEANDBLUE and 459 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to Wakefield Trinity


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
35260
2m
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
57092
7m
Bradford semi-final tickets
Bullseye
14
10m
2024 Southstandercom Prediction Competition Week 8
taxi4stevesm
15
13m
St Helens
Matt King's
224
17m
Rugby leagie coaches - analysis request
Velcro Boots
9
27m
FINANCES
4everfax
2
39m
Shopping list for 2025
B0NES
931
45m
Seagulls
Hudd-Shay
11
46m
Isa
LopburiMonke
19
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
36s
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
35260
39s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Chris71
148
43s
Fitzgibbon
Wires71
25
1m
Sheffield Game
REDWHITEANDB
3
1m
WIRE YED Prediction Competition Leigh Home
Wire n Steel
8
1m
Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE
thesaint71
2044
1m
Castleford at home
MattyB
26
1m
Rugby leagie coaches - analysis request
Velcro Boots
9
1m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
Trebor1
1522
2m
2024 Southstandercom Prediction Competition Week 8
taxi4stevesm
15
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
FINANCES
4everfax
2
TODAY
AI predictions
Rugby Raider
3
TODAY
Sheffield Game
REDWHITEANDB
3
TODAY
Injury update
Belle Vue
3
TODAY
Seagulls
Hudd-Shay
11
TODAY
Rugby leagie coaches - analysis request
Velcro Boots
9
TODAY
Castleford at home
MattyB
26
TODAY
David Armstrong potential signing
LeythIg
4
TODAY
France v England Internationals Confirmed for 29th June 2024
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
France v England International..
603
Warrington Stun St Helens In C..
1261
2024 Challenge Cup Semi-Finals..
942
Wigan Warriors Demolish Woeful..
1023
Hull KR Eliminate the Cup Hold..
1254
Bradford Bulls Come From Behin..
1642
Bradford Bulls Beat Feathersto..
2244
Giants Thrash FC Again For Top..
2193
Warrington Brush Aside The Rhi..
1643
Wigan Coast to Victory over Le..
1896
Giants Come From Behind For Ea..
2190
Salford Red Devils Defeat Leig..
2586
Catalans Dragons Win See-Saw E..
1987
St Helens Win Derby Game Over ..
1849
Early Season Double for Hull K..
2021
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Table 'boards.stats_fixtures' doesn't exist