Re: Big rule changes : Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:28 am  

That Mon wrote:

I'm fine with the changes .... I thought most was in the rules anyway just not policed fully.

Exactly how I read it. Most of these aren't actually changes, maybe just less leniency on the ruck.

Re: Big rule changes : Fri Dec 08, 2023 4:34 pm  

Tackles only permitted below armpit from next season https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/67658523

Tackles only permitted below armpit from next season https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/67658523

Re: Big rule changes : Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:29 pm  

So, looking at the above photo, this is a foul.

Re: Big rule changes : Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:31 pm  

--[ WW ]-- wrote: Tackles only permitted below armpit from next season https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/67658523 I really don't understand why we are still taking orders from the RFL. What happened to the SL breakaway? If it didn't really happen before, it's surely time for it now?

--[ WW ]-- wrote: Tackles only permitted below armpit from next season https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/67658523 I really don't understand why we are still taking orders from the RFL. What happened to the SL breakaway? If it didn't really happen before, it's surely time for it now?

Re: Big rule changes : Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:36 pm  

Cruncher wrote:

I really don't understand why we are still taking orders from the RFL.

What happened to the SL breakaway? If it didn't really happen before, it's surely time for it now?

I don't like this but can understand why we have to do it. If insurance premiums become unaffordable, there is no future for UK rugby league as a full time sport.

Re: Big rule changes : Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:38 pm  

MadDogg wrote:

I don't like this but can understand why we have to do it. If insurance premiums become unaffordable, there is no future for UK rugby league as a full time sport.

Then there's no future for it.

Because the version they're proposing here is not Rugby League,

Re: Big rule changes : Fri Dec 08, 2023 9:45 pm  

It’s a really worrying time. The game needs to be improved, not watered down and it’s tough to see how we can attract new fans when the games will be littered with penalties. In the first trial game of these rules there were 54 penalties IIRC and the average over the whole trial was in excess of 40 per game. That isn’t the sport I know (and love) and we’ll have to see how much it impacts on people’s enjoyment.

The fans don’t want it and more importantly the players seem to be gutted by the changes and they’re changes I think that potentially make the game more dangerous (for defenders). If somebody told me that in 15/20 years time the sport in the UK is semi professional, I wouldn’t be at all surprised.

Re: Big rule changes : Wed Dec 13, 2023 10:30 pm  

Nevertheless, the same rule changes will surely come to the NRL too, and they will have to cope with it.

Re: Big rule changes : Thu Dec 14, 2023 6:38 am  

moto748 wrote:

Nevertheless, the same rule changes will surely come to the NRL too, and they will have to cope with it.

Is this factual or just theoretical?

Are the NRL thinking of bringing the same rules in?

Bear in mind that when it comes to legislating the game out of existence and basically telling the fans, who've had no say, that they'll now have to watch something else, the NRL has more to lose than SL as RL's a vastly bigger game over there with more vested interests.

I'd be genuinely interested to know if they are in the same position as us. If not, of course, that will put serious question-marks against all future internationals, WCCs, all of which are hard enough to organise as it is.

Also, despite asking several times, I've still not heard a coherent explanation as to why the same inevitability is not set to befall boxing, MMA etc. Again, I'd be genuinely interested to know how they are managing to resist when we supposedly can't.

Re: Big rule changes : Thu Dec 14, 2023 10:22 am  

Cruncher wrote:

Is this factual or just theoretical?

Are the NRL thinking of bringing the same rules in?

Bear in mind that when it comes to legislating the game out of existence and basically telling the fans, who've had no say, that they'll now have to watch something else, the NRL has more to lose than SL as RL's a vastly bigger game over there with more vested interests.

I'd be genuinely interested to know if they are in the same position as us. If not, of course, that will put serious question-marks against all future internationals, WCCs, all of which are hard enough to organise as it is.

Also, despite asking several times, I've still not heard a coherent explanation as to why the same inevitability is not set to befall boxing, MMA etc. Again, I'd be genuinely interested to know how they are managing to resist when we supposedly can't.

£££

Without this the RFL's insurance premium was shooting up way past what they could afford. I don't know whether the NRL's insurance has also gone up but clearly they will be in a better financial position to consider just paying the increased bill rather than changing the sport.