: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:25 pm  

Can the RFL afford to lose another experienced ref ?. I dont think they can.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:36 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

From the report though he didnt just leave his PC unlocked did he? He willfully gave fellow employees details to an external party. I would be instantly dismissed for that!

Where as fooking about on rlfans is an aceptable company policy

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:11 pm  

Hutchie wrote:

Where as fooking about on rlfans is an aceptable company policy

It doesnt impact my productivity!!

(to be honest its difficult to get much lower than my usual 10% anyway!)

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:53 pm  

I always said that Refs were dodgy and couldn't be trusted

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:30 pm  

It all depends on whether he has had DP training in his job; if he has then it's a sacking job.

However, I cannot imagine the RFL organising such training as they cannot organise an inebriation session in a brewery !

In that case, he can plead ignorance and just get a warning.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:33 pm  

I refer you to my previous comment.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:26 pm  

TrevLovesJanice wrote:

It all depends on whether he has had DP training in his job

Kind of. Training or not he is still liable, the emphasis is just on the employer more if he hasnt had some kind of awareness training. That can be in whatever form the company choose, including a simple 1 page print off to digest or a 3 day off site course.