Current thoughts - Mago out or get running up them plantations, get fit or get rid. Maybe a back up halfback, someone with a bit of experience on a short term deal. Big tall strong running second rower, like a McMeekin or Sironen type back rower.
Current thoughts - Mago out or get running up them plantations, get fit or get rid. Maybe a back up halfback, someone with a bit of experience on a short term deal. Big tall strong running second rower, like a McMeekin or Sironen type back rower.
So when they come out and say they aren't doing it (because they never were) they'll be accused of doing a u-turn.
It's quite easy to sit back and sneer at 'fake news' but because things like this are so common, even if it is someone winding people up it's plausible, because of what's happened in the past. It's quite easy to laugh off but it's the thin end of the wedge, which by now is getting very fat.
Sorry it's not worth discussing if you refuse to think beyond three word soundbites.
The world is a complicated place that populists try to paint as black and white/ right and wrong. If you want to take it as a win over the libs then fill your boots but I'd suggest there aren't many serious people who understand the middle east who would say, "yup you know the person who's responsible for all this is Hillary Clinton".
It's quite easy to sit back and sneer at 'fake news' but because things like this are so common, even if it is someone winding people up it's plausible, because of what's happened in the past. It's quite easy to laugh off but it's the thin end of the wedge, which by now is getting very fat.
So we're reduced to "well it might not be true but it sounds like it could be true because look at all these other things we've made up which people believed". It truly is the triumph of truthiness; it's quite embarrassing to watch.
Sorry it's not worth discussing if you refuse to think beyond three word soundbites.
The world is a complicated place that populists try to paint as black and white/ right and wrong. If you want to take it as a win over the libs then fill your boots but I'd suggest there aren't many serious people who understand the middle east who would say, "yup you know the person who's responsible for all this is Hillary Clinton".
I was surprised to learn that the Middle east only became a problem in 2008 - I thought it had been going on a lot longer than that?
Anyway - in Post's statement he does intimate that Hillary Clinton herself said "Hillary Clinton made the middle east more volatile, I gave perfect examples from horses mouth herself as to why it was a mistake to get rid of Gaddafi"
Sorry it's not worth discussing if you refuse to think beyond three word soundbites.
The world is a complicated place that populists try to paint as black and white/ right and wrong. If you want to take it as a win over the libs then fill your boots but I'd suggest there aren't many serious people who understand the middle east who would say, "yup you know the person who's responsible for all this is Hillary Clinton".
I was surprised to learn that the Middle east only became a problem in 2008 - I thought it had been going on a lot longer than that?
Anyway - in Post's statement he does intimate that Hillary Clinton herself said "Hillary Clinton made the middle east more volatile, I gave perfect examples from horses mouth herself as to why it was a mistake to get rid of Gaddafi"
Current thoughts - Mago out or get running up them plantations, get fit or get rid. Maybe a back up halfback, someone with a bit of experience on a short term deal. Big tall strong running second rower, like a McMeekin or Sironen type back rower.
Sorry it's not worth discussing if you refuse to think beyond three word soundbites.
The world is a complicated place that populists try to paint as black and white/ right and wrong. If you want to take it as a win over the libs then fill your boots but I'd suggest there aren't many serious people who understand the middle east who would say, "yup you know the person who's responsible for all this is Hillary Clinton".
Show me where I've mentioned 3 word soundbites.
The world isn't black and white but some things are, Clinton went to that meeting with Sarkozy/Cameron with a view to not getting involved and her weakness as a leader caused her to change her mind on a whim, resulting in nothing but more misery in the middle east. 1 person actions can change the course of history, there's not many.
For instance, Gavrillo Princip, if he doesn't shoot Archduke Franz Ferdinand the world would be a different place.
If Clinto held her resolve then the world would be a better place, not just the middle east.
The world isn't black and white but some things are, Clinton went to that meeting with Sarkozy/Cameron with a view to not getting involved and her weakness as a leader caused her to change her mind on a whim, resulting in nothing but more misery in the middle east. 1 person actions can change the course of history, there's not many.
For instance, Gavrillo Princip, if he doesn't shoot Archduke Franz Ferdinand the world would be a different place.
If Clinto held her resolve then the world would be a better place, not just the middle east.
I think this post must be peak post. She wasn't even President, Obama was making the decisions.
But you really should stop this bizarre whatabouttery as to what would have happened had someone else won. On this and almost everything else, your "team" (this appears to be how its viewed on the right now) won, they are in charge and have been for a long time. Make them take some responsibility for the world as it is, not some made-up space in your head where it's all the fault of Clinton or Corbyn, Remainers or woke libs.
Current thoughts - Mago out or get running up them plantations, get fit or get rid. Maybe a back up halfback, someone with a bit of experience on a short term deal. Big tall strong running second rower, like a McMeekin or Sironen type back rower.
I think this post must be peak post. She wasn't even President, Obama was making the decisions.
But you really should stop this bizarre whatabouttery as to what would have happened had someone else won. On this and almost everything else, your "team" (this appears to be how its viewed on the right now) won, they are in charge and have been for a long time. Make them take some responsibility for the world as it is, not some made-up space in your head where it's all the fault of Clinton or Corbyn, Remainers or woke libs.
Very naive of you to think that only 'The President' has a say on matters, if that were the case why didn't Obama go to the meeting? Why send Clinton with the stance of 'We ain't getting involved? then get involved? The article I posted a link to states in her own words just that and that she told Obama to get involved and he did.
Clinton not getting elected took away the opportunity to right that wrong and try and sort things in Libya, if she would have been elected she would have tried to fix her f**k up/sort her legacy and got involved in troops on the ground, it was have been another Iraq.
You say a side is in charge, again, you are very naive in thinking this. The 'right' may have been elected by the people but it's still NGOs who are influencing things on a grand scale, you only need to look at a certain Hungarian billionaire to know how powerful NGOs can be.
Is your username with relation to the year you were born? Genuine question.