Dally wrote:
You are failing to understand what has been written. I am not equating anything, just pointing out the bias of someone who denies the possibility.
To accept that possibility, you'd have to be starting from the position that homosexuality is somehow 'wrong' or 'abnormal'. Which would make you a disgusting bigot.
Even then, there's not a single shred of evidence to support the 'possibility', so I treat it exactly the same as anything else for which there is no evidence.