Sal Paradise wrote:
Just answer the question?
I am sure your altruistic tendencies fall short of actually offering to earn less so others in your company can earn more.
The idea spouted on here that the shopfloor generate the wealth in a business would be laughable if it weren't such a bonkers idea.
I bet the people of England, Scotland and the USA have a lot more to dance about than your average North Korean
Just on a small point of order.
If there wasn't anybody manufacturing certain goods or taking coal out of the ground, how would the owner of said business make any money ?
Yes, in theory they could become a trader but, then we arrive back at how that business would make any money.
Of course the workers generate the wealth for the owner of any business aided, hopefully, by astute management.
However, without the grafters, there wouldn't be any fat cats. Quite ironic really, dont you think.
The "workers" (well most of them) couldn't run the business but, dont kid yourself that their part isnt important.
In civilised society, nobody should be killing themselves to make another man rich, they should work hard and be rewarded reasonably well for their efforts.
There are major issues with some salaries in this country, not least when you compare government ministers with their counterparts in local government.
We have leaders of local authorities earning more than the prime minister, that cant be right ?
Public servants on gilt edged pensions, when the people that they once served may not even have a pension, and they often get those pensions "bumped up" to allow them to retire early, that cant be right either ?