... after serving one quarter of their sentences, in open prisons.
Obviously, rehabilitated in double quick time. Well done them. Warms the cockles etc. Oh, they haven't paid the prosecution costs yet. They are still challenging the size of the bills. Or, their QCs are........
... after serving one quarter of their sentences, in open prisons.
Obviously, rehabilitated in double quick time. Well done them. Warms the cockles etc. Oh, they haven't paid the prosecution costs yet. They are still challenging the size of the bills. Or, their QCs are........
Would holding them in prison longer actually serve much purpose, I doubt either of them are dangerous to anyone except the Liberal Democrat party.
I reckon quite a few of the people currently residing in our prisons are 'not dangerous', but most of those will serve at least half of their sentences.
Well, to do half their sentences, even in an open prison, would be the average retribution/punishment which most people would have to do.
I don't think it's rare though for someone to be released early on low sentences. In the Guardian article you linked to says its possible Prisoners serving sentences of between three months and four years, with certain exceptions for violent and sexual offenders, may also be eligible for release on a home detention curfew. I would have thought they were perfect candidates for that scheme. I don't know what the stats are for people released early from prison for perverting the course of justice but I doubt they've been more leniently dealt with.
I reckon quite a few of the people currently residing in our prisons are 'not dangerous', but most of those will serve at least half of their sentences.
True but I would imagine such things like being a flight risk and risk of reoffending would be taken into account too, not to mention to be released early you have to be given a lower sentence.
I think you can confidently state that no offender could possibly have been more leniently treated, ever. Maybe they merit being the joint most leniently treated jailbirds, who knows.
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece ---------------------------------------------------------- Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork ---------------------------------------------------------- JerryChicken - The Blog ----------------------------------------------------------
I don't think it's rare though for someone to be released early on low sentences. In the Guardian article you linked to says its possible Prisoners serving sentences of between three months and four years, with certain exceptions for violent and sexual offenders, may also be eligible for release on a home detention curfew. I would have thought they were perfect candidates for that scheme. I don't know what the stats are for people released early from prison for perverting the course of justice but I doubt they've been more leniently dealt with.
I know of one such person who was dealt with in the same way, his crime was money laundering so slightly higher up the scale than putting your wife's name down on the dobbing-in form, a few weeks in a low grade prison and he was being allowed home on weekends "to run his business" and then a tag and release a couple of months into his sentence.
I know of one such person who was dealt with in the same way, his crime was money laundering so slightly higher up the scale than putting your wife's name down on the dobbing-in form, a few weeks in a low grade prison and he was being allowed home on weekends "to run his business" and then a tag and release a couple of months into his sentence.
I also know of someone dealt with in a similar way. Also done for perverting the course of justice but had previous offences and was let out with a tag in the same way that these 2 have.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 118 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...