Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:13 am  

Latest from this weeks RL press on structuring.
Championship clubs will meet up on July 5th to have their say on the proposed changes to the league structure.

Super League representatives met up earlier this month to discuss a number of key issues, including the possibility of an expanded Super League competition.

With those plans now apparently gaining increased support from Super League clubs moving forward senior figures from the twelve Championship clubs will meet next week to discuss the proposals put on the table by their Super League counterparts and how they may affect them moving forward.

The press understands the RFL has not yet set out the exact points of discussion to the clubs but the potential restructuring will be at the top of the agenda.

A proposal was put forward at the Super League meeting that could see Super League return to a 13 or 14 team competition.
A number of Championship clubs are keen to seek assurances on their position should that happen and the implications it could have on central distribution of funding and their prospects of earning promotion to Super league in the future or whether the new concept will result in teams being locked to the second tier.

Another topic of discussion will be the future of the Super 8's structure should Super League take in two additional teams.
Any change to the number of teams in both competitions will entail changes both to the regular season format and the Super League 8s themselves should the structure actually remain in place.

An additional complicating factor is that any changes made to the league structure must be approved by Sky as Sky's current broadcasting agreement with the RFL carried the proviso that both Super league and the Championship were 12 team competitions with the Super 8's format and any adjustments would have to be accepted by the leading figures at BSkyB.

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:29 am  

If any restructure happens would it come in to immediate effect for 2018 ?

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:46 am  

mr t hall wrote:

If any restructure happens would it come in to immediate effect for 2018 ?

Your answer to that, Ian,is Bradford.

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 10:06 am  

Hudd-Shay wrote:

Your answer to that, Ian,is Bradford.

Agree and posted already,but on reflection this would undermine this years middle 8s and render the million pound match worthless.If this happens the remaining 250 of us that bothered to turn up at Swinton will be one more light next season.

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 10:10 am  

mr t hall wrote:

If any restructure happens would it come in to immediate effect for 2018 ?

The official decision is yet to be made but.
The cynical side of me (that seems to be getting bigger as the years goes by) is that if it's up to the RFL and current SL the additional two clubs will come from HKR, Toronto, Toulouse and London and it will be whenever any of those tick the box concocted by the RFL and SL.

If someone else where to tick the box such as say Fev, then they would find something to put an hold on it until they faded away like they did with Keighley some years back.

As you say an additional rosette for the powers that be to wear proudly on their old pals chest would say.
"We saved Bradford from relegation from the Championship".

I forgot to add that it will protect Catalans from ever suffering the same fate as what happened to HKR.

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:41 am  

mr t hall wrote:

If any restructure happens would it come in to immediate effect for 2018 ?

Who knows?

However, I am very much against creating a situation where the metaphorical goalposts are shifted during the season.

We don't change the rules during a game and we shouldn't change the rules during the season either.

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:45 am  

faxcar wrote:

I forgot to add that it will protect Catalans from ever suffering the same fate as what happened to HKR.

Is not one of the problems that the inclusion of teams like Toronto, Catalans, Toulouse and Uzbekhistan Rovers makes no sense in an environment largely populated by part time clubs ?

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:54 am  

griff1998 wrote:

Is not one of the problems that the inclusion of teams like Toronto, Catalans, Toulouse and Uzbekhistan Rovers makes no sense in an environment largely populated by part time clubs ?

Yes, fully agree and I think that shows that the teams mentioned will be given preference and internal assistance to change their environment from the Championship to SL, otherwise why would their owners bother if they hadn't been given a behind the scenes nod, only then does it make any sense.

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 1:48 pm  

faxcar wrote:

Yes, fully agree and I think that shows that the teams mentioned will be given preference and internal assistance to change their environment from the Championship to SL, otherwise why would their owners bother if they hadn't been given a behind the scenes nod, only then does it make any sense.

Nod, maybe. But the notion that $uperleague clubs will chip in a few quid to finance them is difficult to believe.

However, as always, it's the clubs who make the decisions, not the RFL.

Re: Restructure part 2. : Tue Jun 27, 2017 1:54 pm  

mr t hall wrote:

Agree and posted already,but on reflection this would undermine this years middle 8s and render the million pound match worthless.If this happens the remaining 250 of us that bothered to turn up at Swinton will be one more light next season.

You're not the first person I've heard say that. Perhaps The RFL are going down the pub company route. You know the one, buy up a chain of pubs and the ones you don't want just run them into the ground until there's hardly any customers left. You then cast them aside saying they're unviable and concentrate on the one's left. Now swap your pub for your rugby club and fat Nige and his cronies are laughing all the way to Toronto, Toulouse and Australia. Forgive me for being cynical but we'll have a look in five years time and see where we all are, eh?