Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:15 am  

BrisbaneRhino wrote:

According to the paper here, Segeyaro may debut for the Sharks this weekend.

He must've really worked hard whilst not training with Cronulla for the past few months then.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:09 am  

Jayden Brailey had his worst game in the surprise loss to St George at the weekend, no reason to think Segeyaro couldn't add something to the 17 - especially from the bench.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:50 am  

Whilst I am one of the people who thinks we should have just cut ties with Segeyaro and let him go straight away, I don't see how anyone can be anything other than pleased with Parcell.
His style was always going to work well in Super League - he's got good distribution, a very dangerous and quick scooter, seems to take the right options and is very sound defensively.
So whilst I might disagree with the stance taken on Segeyaro (and question the true reason why GH was 'playing hardball') GH should be praised for sourcing such an adequate replacement. I'd have Parcell down as one of, if not possibly the best 9 in SL.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:26 am  

Superted wrote:

Whilst I am one of the people who thinks we should have just cut ties with Segeyaro and let him go straight away, I don't see how anyone can be anything other than pleased with Parcell.
His style was always going to work well in Super League - he's got good distribution, a very dangerous and quick scooter, seems to take the right options and is very sound defensively.
So whilst I might disagree with the stance taken on Segeyaro (and question the true reason why GH was 'playing hardball') GH should be praised for sourcing such an adequate replacement. I'd have Parcell down as one of, if not possibly the best 9 in SL.

I think this is premature when there are the likes of Roby, Clarke, Houghton & even Aiton in the frame for the best no 9.
In time maybe, he's made a promising start & is developing an excellent understanding with Cuthbertson but let's not get carried away just yet. One thing is for sure though he's better than Falloon.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 12:00 pm  

Old Feller wrote:

I think this is premature when there are the likes of Roby, Clarke, Houghton & even Aiton in the frame for the best no 9.
In time maybe, he's made a promising start & is developing an excellent understanding with Cuthbertson but let's not get carried away just yet. One thing is for sure though he's better than Falloon.

That's why I said possibly - on current form I don't see any other 9 playing much better, so if he holds his form and continues to develop, then he's definitely there or thereabouts.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 12:55 pm  

Parcell is better than Segeyaro now?

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:36 pm  

William Eve wrote:

Parcell is better than Segeyaro now?

Obviously not but Chicko hasn't played or trained with anyone in 6 months (so he and Cronulla claim) meaning he's going to struggle for a while.
Based on current form then... Parcell is much better.

On another similar note, is Cuthbertson really bang average now?

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:01 pm  

Still early days but considering we looked up S**t creek without a paddle at Christmas regards the hooking role Parcell is about as good as we could have ever hoped for with such little time available and players for that matter.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:51 pm  

Cuthbertson looks very average this year??? Utter nonsense as per usual.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:26 am  

ThePrinter wrote:

Cuthbertson looks very average this year??? Utter nonsense as per usual.

Cuthbertson has been one of the best props in the league so far. Gained massive metres every game, made plenty of tackles and he's rediscovered how to offload. Everything we do at the moment is coming off the back of his and Parcell's work.