Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 2:52 pm  

William Eve wrote: "He terminated that contract by failing to return to the club [Jan 3rd 2017] but he remains on our register and on the transfer list," Hetherington added. Always possible the club asked him to return early from his break given the media storm his story made. They made Hardaker return to preseason early after the 2013 WC.

William Eve wrote: "He terminated that contract by failing to return to the club [Jan 3rd 2017] but he remains on our register and on the transfer list," Hetherington added. Always possible the club asked him to return early from his break given the media storm his story made. They made Hardaker return to preseason early after the 2013 WC.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:16 pm  

Was that before or after GH signed Matt Parcell?

Date Parcell signing was officially announced... Dec 21st, 2016.
Date Segeyaro was due back... Jan 3rd, 2017.

"He [Segeyaro] terminated that contract by failing to return to the club [Jan 3rd, 2017] but he remains on our register and on the transfer list," - GH (24th Jan, 2017)

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 3:28 pm  

William Eve wrote:

Was that before or after GH signed Matt Parcell?

Date Parcell signing was officially announced... Dec 21st, 2016.
Date Segeyaro was due back... Jan 3rd, 2017.

"He [Segeyaro] terminated that contract by failing to return to the club [Jan 3rd, 2017] but he remains on our register and on the transfer list," - GH (24th Jan, 2017)

Yes and as I pointed out they may well have asked him to return early.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:18 pm  

The products of your fertile imagination does not equate to pointing anything out.

"He [Segeyaro] terminated that contract by failing to return to the club [Jan 3rd, 2017] but he remains on our register and on the transfer list," - GH (24th Jan, 2017)

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:23 pm  

William Eve wrote:

Was that before or after GH signed Matt Parcell?

Date Parcell signing was officially announced... Dec 21st, 2016.
Date Segeyaro was due back... Jan 3rd, 2017.

"He [Segeyaro] terminated that contract by failing to return to the club [Jan 3rd, 2017] but he remains on our register and on the transfer list," - GH (24th Jan, 2017)

CHRISTIAN NICOLUSSI, The Daily Telegraph December 6, 2016 12:04am

Segeyaro told The Sunday Telegraph nine days ago he was homesick and had no intention of returning to Leeds next month, despite being contracted until the end of 2018. ( SUNDAY 27th NOVEMBER ).

It’s understood Segeyaro’s management has already written to Leeds, informing them the 26-year-old will not return.

If this is the case then Slam Dunk another legal victory. All this was done long before the wages were stopped and replacement player signed.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:27 pm  

William Eve wrote:

The products of your fertile imagination does not equate to pointing anything out.

"He [Segeyaro] terminated that contract by failing to return to the club [Jan 3rd, 2017] but he remains on our register and on the transfer list," - GH (24th Jan, 2017)

You can keep putting [Jan 3rd 2017] as many times as you like but it doesn't once feature in that article you linked to so pointless you including it in a quote from it.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:28 pm  

illy wrote:

CHRISTIAN NICOLUSSI, The Daily Telegraph December 6, 2016 12:04am

Segeyaro told The Sunday Telegraph nine days ago he was homesick and had no intention of returning to Leeds next month, despite being contracted until the end of 2018. ( SUNDAY 27th NOVEMBER ).

It’s understood Segeyaro’s management has already written to Leeds, informing them the 26-year-old will not return.

If this is the case then Slam Dunk after legal victory. All this was done long before the wages were stopped and replacement player signed.

I hope the above is not an alternative fact, if so the matter would appear to be pretty clear cut.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:37 pm  

Old Feller wrote:

I hope the above is not an alternative fact, if so the matter would appear to be pretty clear cut.

Is it understood to not be so, and therefore pretty clear cut?

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:41 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

You can keep putting [Jan 3rd 2017] as many times as you like but it doesn't once feature in that article you linked to so pointless you including it in a quote from it.

You can keep claiming that the club may have issued an ultimatum that Segeyaro return earlier than Jan 3rd 2017 as many times as you like, but it'll still be nothing more than a product of your fertile imagination.

Jan 3rd 2017 was when Segeyaro was due to return.

Re: Player | James Segeyaro : Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:47 pm  

William Eve wrote:

Jan 3rd 2017 was when Segeyaro was due to return.

Key word WAS......that WAS before he opened his mouth and said he wouldn't return.