Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:23 pm  

http://www.therhinos.co.uk/news/16146.php with a grade B offence

http://www.therhinos.co.uk/news/16146.php with a grade B offence

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:27 pm  

That'll make him even Crosser!!

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:40 pm  

Cross charged..........................under trade descriptions act?

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:43 pm  

Deserved imo but should'nt be anything other than a fine and a warning.

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:44 pm  

thebloodbath wrote:

Cross charged..........................under trade descriptions act?

Does anyone actually think anything will come of this?

Unlikely, but, if he gets a ban, who would you play in lieu of?

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:45 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

Deserved imo but should'nt be anything other than a fine and a warning.

Let's hope so!!

Otherwise which ever of us weighs the most needs to take his boots on Friday!

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:46 pm  

So with Leuluai and Peacock injured, Bailey going for an operation this week, Ambler and Amor out on Loan, Kirke doing 4 drives per game, and now Cross likely to be suspended (I don't think they have called him up to Red Hall just to say hello) that leaves us with Burgess as our only recognised Prop currently available...

I bet the Salford pack are rubbing their hands.

The next two home games after Salford are Saints and Wigan, I wonder what the chances of a home record of "Played 4, Lost 4" are????

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:11 pm  

It's good news for Cross that he plays alongside Kirke.

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:11 pm  

Is this for the hit on Myler which was a split-second late?

Re: Cross charged .. : Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:13 pm  

kirkstaller wrote:

Is this for the hit on Myler which was a split-second late?

If you think that was a split-second your Mrs. must take HOURS in the bathroom!