Cunningham Not Guilty : Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:48 pm  

Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution

Thought he would pick up a ban for that punch but then again Peacock has got away with a few punches this year

Re: Cunningham Not Guilty : Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:50 pm  

Rommel wrote:

:shock:
Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution

Thought he would pick up a ban for that punch but then again Peacock has got away with a few punches this year

The RFL recognises the King's authority, which is good to see

Re: Cunningham Not Guilty : Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:51 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

The RFL recognises the King's authority, which is good to see

Long live the KING

: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:12 pm  

Someone pass Chair Maker some tissues

: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:13 pm  

good stuff

Re: Cunningham Not Guilty : Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:17 pm  

Rommel wrote:

:shock:
Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution

Thought he would pick up a ban for that punch but then again Peacock has got away with a few punches this year

How the heck does that work? Yes i meant to throw a punch at him, but I didn't think it'd actually hit him?

Re: Cunningham Not Guilty : Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:23 pm  

Rommel wrote:

:shock:
Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution

Thought he would pick up a ban for that punch but then again Peacock has got away with a few punches this year

So he isnt actually "not guilty"

He is in fact guilty.

: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:25 pm  

Probably ge tinjured in trainign and miss the rest of the season now.

: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:21 pm  

http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/inju ... 05926.html Now that Kieron has got off Wakey tell us all that Stosic(sp) hasn't fractured his eye socket after all

http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/inju ... 05926.html Now that Kieron has got off Wakey tell us all that Stosic(sp) hasn't fractured his eye socket after all

: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:24 pm  

Rommel wrote:

http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/injury-update-i605926.html

Now that Kieron has got off Wakey tell us all that Stosic(sp) hasn't fractured his eye socket after all