Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:13 pm  

DemonUK wrote:

So, hang on, if the administrator now sells the 'club' you will have two clubs and the original club if someone so wished could apply for membership of the RFL starting in Champ 1. Oh what a tangled web we weave.

Administrator still has old club. Thorne bought up some of the assets including the Bulls name. Chalmers is starting a brand new club that maybe can't use the Bulls moniker, the second named director of Chalmers new company is a NZ rugby league club who finished bottom of the NZ league last year and who were going to apply for a SL franchise in 2007.

They won't get an RFL licence though, so the old club is no use.

Well this is what i'm thinking as i don't really understand

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:14 pm  

Maybe Green got paid with shares in BB2017?

[Bullseye]

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:19 pm  

From what I read of Adey’s post on TotalRL it may be that Green hasn’t been paid out at all. The matter may be sub judice so I’d be grateful if we could not speculate too wildly.

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:49 pm  

There has to be a book in this somewhere!!

[Bulliac]

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:51 pm  

...or even a series!

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:25 pm  

Can we ask the BBC to use our last 8 weeks as the next case for Sherlock Holmes.

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:17 pm  

I am grateful for the recent Sherlock series, as I didn't think anything could be more convoluted or impenetrable than the affairs of the Bulls, but the script proved how wrong you can be.

[Bulliac]

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 4:06 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

I am grateful for the recent Sherlock series, as I didn't think anything could be more convoluted or impenetrable than the affairs of the Bulls, but the script proved how wrong you can be.

You sure about that?

I put everything I couldn't understand about Sherlock down to it being a 'dream sequence' and not intended to be understood. If you do the same for the latest Bulls adventure, but substitute, 'nightmare', for dream, I don't think there is much difference really.

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 5:12 pm  

woolly07 wrote:

Can we ask the BBC to use our last 8 weeks as the next case for Sherlock Holmes.

A better fit would be Netflix's "A series of unfortunate events"...

Re: Greens Charge paid in full : Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:01 pm  

woolly07 wrote:

Can we ask the BBC to use our last 8 weeks as the next case for Sherlock Holmes.

What about Dallas and Chris Caisley comes out of the shower and says

"Iestyn Harris?? We are not signing him"