Re: Ownership and twists : Thu Mar 27, 2014 7:23 am
gutterfax wrote:
1. Mandy didn't get as far as to be bounced by the RFL. She bid too low and that was that....didn't get to 2nd base so to speak!
2. Lamb was asked to show proof of funds. He didn't......sorry, but if you've got funds available, then proof of them should be easy to provide. 24 Hours is not a long time to get a bank statement or legal draft guaranteeing funds....unless the funds aren't actually funds yet.
No amount of press releases by "failed" bidders will change the fact that if the RFL had acted in a criminal or libellous manner, they'd be in court.......needless to say, the threat of legal action, like twitter posts aren't worth the paper they aren't written on!
The RFL have saved Bradford again.....instead of bitching about it, their fans should be thankful they aren't planning a trip to Hemel next year!
2. Lamb was asked to show proof of funds. He didn't......sorry, but if you've got funds available, then proof of them should be easy to provide. 24 Hours is not a long time to get a bank statement or legal draft guaranteeing funds....unless the funds aren't actually funds yet.
No amount of press releases by "failed" bidders will change the fact that if the RFL had acted in a criminal or libellous manner, they'd be in court.......needless to say, the threat of legal action, like twitter posts aren't worth the paper they aren't written on!
The RFL have saved Bradford again.....instead of bitching about it, their fans should be thankful they aren't planning a trip to Hemel next year!
As your final statement, can I say you may be in the minority in saying the RFL were the "who" in the "who saved who stakes"> If that is meant as a bitter pill to swallow for Bradford fans...I would say it isn't well disguised, or in fact sweetened?