Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 9:11 am  

Not only that but he said he wanted to play centre in RU not flanker. That statement helps Lancaster and Farrell.

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 9:22 am  

kobashi wrote:

http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=9051131

Sam saying he missed playing rugby league.

Well going from 25 carries and 35 tackles per game, having to run back ten metres on every tackle and be constantly involved; to standing around with his hands on his hips/knees taking in about 4 carries and 6 tackles per game...only total lazy lovers wouldn't miss playing league.

For someone like Sam, rugby union must be a total dirge to be involved in and all these many players in that sport who've only known that they just don't realise what they're missing out on in RL.

And to be fighting against bitter people who want to see him fail is just ridiculous. Life's far too short to be around people who are against you and a rugby playing career is far far too short for that. So he's coming back to where he's loved in our sport and i don't blame him.

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 9:32 am  

Suggest reading original article on DM online. Hard for me to link from small phone.

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 9:50 am  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyu ... -t-it.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyu ... -t-it.html

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:03 am  

UK Daily Telegraph approaches same story from a different angle.

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:03 am  

UK Daily Telegraph approaches same story from a different angle.

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 11:51 am  

He says he was bored, couldn't pretend he enjoyed Rugby Union anymore, that ex players, coaches and media had an agenda from the outset which was disappointing, some ex players don't want anyone to be more successful than they were especially a Rugby League convert.

He points out that whenever he was on the field for England they were never behind except when he came on for 8 minutes at the end of the Australia match when the game was already gone.

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 11:59 am  

The Avenger wrote:

He points out that whenever he was on the field for England they were never behind except when he came on for 8 minutes at the end of the Australia match when the game was already gone.

That's a fair point.Sam Burgess was far from the reason England failed in the WC. He did well against Fiji off the bench and was solid against Wales in a game they were leading when he was withdrawn late on and they really should have gotten at least a point which would have got them out the group phase. It's shocking really that from now on he will be probably seen as one of the major reasons England failed so massively at this WC when in truth, the team as a whole had far more shortcomings and were simply just not good enough.

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:04 pm  

Still think Sam would have been well suited to the Number 8 position.

Re: Sam Burgess : Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:44 pm  

Biff Tannen wrote:

That's a fair point.Sam Burgess was far from the reason England failed in the WC. He did well against Fiji off the bench and was solid against Wales in a game they were leading when he was withdrawn late on and they really should have gotten at least a point which would have got them out the group phase. It's shocking really that from now on he will be probably seen as one of the major reasons England failed so massively at this WC when in truth, the team as a whole had far more shortcomings and were simply just not good enough.

Much as that disgusts me, I am quite happy for the RFU to continue to refuse to accept the blinding obvious if it means they will think twice about recruiting from RL & they continue to fail in major competitions.